BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19452426)

  • 1. The risk of acute neonatal morbidities in the delivery room after primary cesarean at term: influence of labor and stage.
    Winovitch KC; Wing DA; Lagrew DC; Chung JH
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Sep; 26(8):545-51. PubMed ID: 19452426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome in second- versus first-stage cesarean delivery in a teaching institution in eastern India.
    Seal SL; Kamilya G; Mukherji J; Bhattacharyya SK; De A; Hazra A
    Am J Perinatol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 20175041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Laros RK; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):585.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17547906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase.
    Chelmow D; Kilpatrick SJ; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 8459953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary cesarean delivery.
    Geller EJ; Wu JM; Jannelli ML; Nguyen TV; Visco AG
    J Perinatol; 2010 Apr; 30(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 19812591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.
    Rabiu KA; Adewunmi AA; Akinola OI; Eti AE; Tayo AO
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2011 Sep; 18(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 21909144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
    Schmitz T; Carnavalet Cde C; Azria E; Lopez E; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 18310373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity.
    Selo-Ojeme D; Sathiyathasan S; Fayyaz M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 278(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 18189142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean deliveries: when is a pediatrician necessary?
    Jacob J; Pfenninger J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 89(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 9015023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity.
    Cohen WR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Mar; 49(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 300151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor.
    Sung JF; Daniels KI; Brodzinsky L; El-Sayed YY; Caughey AB; Lyell DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):306.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor.
    Cheng YW; Delaney SS; Hopkins LM; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):477.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19608153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time of delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    Caughey AB; Urato AC; Lee KA; Thiet MP; Washington AE; Laros RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 199(5):496.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18501323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
    Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kielland vs. nonrotational forceps for the second stage of labor.
    Krivak TC; Drewes P; Horowitz GM
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Jun; 44(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 10394545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate neonatal outcomes after elective induction of labor.
    Beebe L; Beaty C; Rayburn W
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 17465284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery.
    De Luca R; Boulvain M; Irion O; Berner M; Pfister RE
    Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123(6):e1064-71. PubMed ID: 19482739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean delivery during second-stage labor: characteristics and diagnostic accuracy.
    Garrett K; Butler A; Cohen WR
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jan; 17(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15804787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.