223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19453322)
1. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway.
Janakiraman C; Chethan DB; Wilkes AR; Stacey MR; Goodwin N
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jun; 64(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 19453322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.
Shin WJ; Cheong YS; Yang HS; Nishiyama T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):598-601. PubMed ID: 19915475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the Soft Seal disposable and the Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway.
Shafik MT; Bahlman BU; Hall JE; Ali MS
Anaesthesia; 2006 Feb; 61(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 16430570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients.
Shariffuddin II; Wang CY
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jan; 63(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 18086075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic and single-use laryngeal mask airways.
Danha RF; Thompson JL; Popat MT; Pandit JJ
Anaesthesia; 2005 Feb; 60(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 15644018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised comparison of the Portex Softseal laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-Unique during anaesthesia.
Cook TM; Trümpelmann P; Beringer R; Stedeford J
Anaesthesia; 2005 Dec; 60(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 16288620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade.
Lardner DR; Cox RG; Ewen A; Dickinson D
Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18166745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the i-gel and classic LMA insertion in manikins by experienced and novice physicians.
Stroumpoulis K; Isaia C; Bassiakou E; Pantazopoulos I; Troupis G; Mazarakis A; Demestiha T; Xanthos T
Eur J Emerg Med; 2012 Feb; 19(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 21593672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
Theiler LG; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Kaiser D; Urwyler N; Luyet C; Vogt A; Greif R; Unibe MM
Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.
Goyal R; Shukla RN; Kumar G
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 22151106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fibrescope guided intubation via the classic laryngeal mask airway and i-gel in a manikin.
de Lloyd L; Hodzovic I; Voisey S; Wilkes AR; Latto IP
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jan; 65(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19891671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised, crossover comparison between the CobraPLA and the LMA Classic in paralysed patients.
Nam SB; Han DW; Chang CH; Lee JS
Anaesthesia; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1285-8. PubMed ID: 17991267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children.
Lee JR; Kim MS; Kim JT; Byon HJ; Park YH; Kim HS; Kim CS
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 22352745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway.
López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Intersurgical Solus laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel supralaryngeal device.
Amini S; Khoshfetrat M
Anaesthesia; 2010 Aug; 65(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 20560920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised, crossover comparison of the single-use SoftSeal and the LMA Unique laryngeal mask airways.
Paech MJ; Tweedie O; Stannard K; Hepp M; Dodd P; Daly H; Bennett EJ; Millard A; Doherty DA
Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 15766338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children.
Jagannathan N; Sommers K; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Shah RD; Mukherji II; Miller S; Voronov P; Seraphin S
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23189931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
