These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19453557)
1. Data quality and clinical decision-making: do we trust machines blindly? Pesudovs K; Applegate RA Clin Exp Optom; 2009 May; 92(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 19453557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aberrometry: clinical and research applications. Applegate RA; Marcos S; Thibos LN Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 80(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 12597322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Aberrometry: the past, present, and future of optometry. Thibos LN; Applegate RA; Marcos S Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12553538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of monochromatic ocular aberrations measured with an objective cross-cylinder aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Hong X; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Woods RL; Applegate RA Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12553540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?". Borish IM; Catania LJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent advances in measurement of monochromatic aberrations of human eyes. Atchison DA Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Jan; 88(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 15658922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new system of refraction for use by the general practitioner. Molteno AC; Molteno TE S Afr Med J; 1977 Aug; 52(9):354-5. PubMed ID: 897946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of autorefractor performance. Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic photorefraction system: an offline application for the dynamic analysis of ocular focus and pupil size from photorefraction images. Suryakumar R; Kwok D; Fernandez S; Bobier WR Comput Biol Med; 2009 Mar; 39(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 19217087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Will wavefront aberrometry become a part of routine optometric practice? Charman WN Clin Exp Optom; 2004 May; 87(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15186202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The establishment and evaluation of the subjective measuring instrument for tonic accommodation]. Xu D; Lu F; Qu J; Jiang BC Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 29(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 15875684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Representative important questions in clinical optometry. Heath GG Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Apr; 58(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 7282853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reply to Richard Symes. Kunavisarut P Eye (Lond); 2013 Jun; 27(6):779. PubMed ID: 23579413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors. McCaghrey GE; Matthews FE Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Apr; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 8265146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]