1806 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19454805)
1. Modelling carcinogenesis after radiotherapy using Poisson statistics: implications for IMRT, protons and ions.
Jones B
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A143-57. PubMed ID: 19454805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers.
Hall EJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 May; 65(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16618572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiotherapy systems using proton and carbon beams.
Jongen Y
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 2008; 163(10-12):471-8; discussion 479-80. PubMed ID: 20120253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation-induced cancers from modern radiotherapy techniques: intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton therapy.
Yoon M; Ahn SH; Kim J; Shin DH; Park SY; Lee SB; Shin KH; Cho KH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Aug; 77(5):1477-85. PubMed ID: 19879701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the impact of photon and proton external beam radiotherapy treatment modalities on the dose distribution in field and out-of-field; implications for the long-term morbidity of cancer survivors.
Palm A; Johansson KA
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(4):462-73. PubMed ID: 17497313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does electron and proton therapy reduce the risk of radiation induced cancer after spinal irradiation for childhood medulloblastoma? A comparative treatment planning study.
Mu X; Björk-Eriksson T; Nill S; Oelfke U; Johansson KA; Gagliardi G; Johansson L; Karlsson M; Zackrisson DB
Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):554-62. PubMed ID: 16165914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current status of radiotherapy with proton and light ion beams.
Greco C; Wolden S
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(7):1227-38. PubMed ID: 17326046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy on second cancer risk in the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer.
Zwahlen DR; Ruben JD; Jones P; Gagliardi F; Millar JL; Schneider U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jun; 74(2):539-45. PubMed ID: 19427555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT and volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques.
Johansen S; Cozzi L; Olsen DR
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 19169915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on radiation-induced second malignancies.
Ruben JD; Davis S; Evans C; Jones P; Gagliardi F; Haynes M; Hunter A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Apr; 70(5):1530-6. PubMed ID: 18207670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No.
Suit H; Kooy H; Trofimov A; Farr J; Munzenrider J; DeLaney T; Loeffler J; Clasie B; Safai S; Paganetti H
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 18237800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison of biologically optimized spread-out bragg peaks for protons and carbon ions.
Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):262-6. PubMed ID: 17935903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurements of secondary neutron dose from 15 MV and 18 MV IMRT.
Howell RM; Ferenci MS; Hertel NE; Fullerton GD; Fox T; Davis LW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):508-12. PubMed ID: 16381776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biophysical modelling of proton radiation effects based on amorphous track models.
Paganetti H; Goitein M
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Sep; 77(9):911-28. PubMed ID: 11576451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [IMRT combined to IGRT: increase of the irradiated volume. Consequences?].
Lisbona A; Averbeck D; Supiot S; Delpon G; Ali D; Vinas F; Diana C; Murariu C; Lagrange JL
Cancer Radiother; 2010 Oct; 14(6-7):563-70. PubMed ID: 20729117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High relative biologic effectiveness of carbon ion radiation on induction of rat mammary carcinoma and its lack of H-ras and Tp53 mutations.
Imaoka T; Nishimura M; Kakinuma S; Hatano Y; Ohmachi Y; Yoshinaga S; Kawano A; Maekawa A; Shimada Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 17707273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental determination of peripheral doses for different IMRT techniques delivered by a Siemens linear accelerator.
Wiezorek T; Voigt A; Metzger N; Georg D; Schwedas M; Salz H; Wendt TG
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 18259698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failla Memorial lecture. The future of heavy-ion science in biology and medicine.
Tobias CA
Radiat Res; 1985 Jul; 103(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 3906741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy.
Chera BS; Rodriguez C; Morris CG; Louis D; Yeung D; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1173-80. PubMed ID: 19386423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
