2400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455003)
1. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis.
Schmidt H; Heuer F; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 17997207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
Little JP; Adam CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interaction between finite helical axes and facet joint forces under combined loading.
Schmidt H; Heuer F; Wilke HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2741-8. PubMed ID: 19050579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
Moumene M; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
Goel VK; Kong W; Han JS; Weinstein JN; Gilbertson LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1531-41. PubMed ID: 8235826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
