BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455003)

  • 21. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis.
    Lafage V; Gangnet N; Sénégas J; Lavaste F; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1706-13. PubMed ID: 17632390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanics of a novel minimally invasive lumbar interspinous spacer: effects on kinematics, facet loads, and foramen height.
    Lazaro BC; Brasiliense LB; Sawa AG; Reyes PM; Theodore N; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):126-32; discussion 132-3. PubMed ID: 20173562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
    Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis.
    Jahng TA; Kim YE; Moon KY
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparative study of vertebral body stress distribution following insertion of artificial lumbar intervertebral disc].
    Xu YC; Liu SL; Zhang MC; Huang DS; Wang QY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 42(24):1485-8. PubMed ID: 15733478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
    Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.
    Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation.
    Stieber JR; Quirno M; Kang M; Valdevit A; Errico TJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement.
    Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finite element analysis of the spondylolysis in lumbar spine.
    Wang JP; Zhong ZC; Cheng CK; Chen CS; Yu CH; Chang TK; Wei SH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 17075165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
    Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of slip severity and loading directions on the stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a finite element model study.
    Natarajan RN; Garretson RB; Biyani A; Lim TH; Andersson GB; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1103-12. PubMed ID: 12782976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system.
    Wilke HJ; Heuer F; Schmidt H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19179920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.
    Rohlmann A; Nabil Boustani H; Bergmann G; Zander T
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2963-9. PubMed ID: 20696430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 120.