1307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455004)
1. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facet joint changes after application of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization.
Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E6. PubMed ID: 26721580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of dynamic neutralization system and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang B; Jiang T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 27(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 23596677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Adjacent segment movement after monosegmental total disc replacement and monosegmental fusion of segments L4/5].
Däxle M; Kocak T; Lattig F; Reichel H; Cakir B
Orthopade; 2013 Feb; 42(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 23381895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term Outcome After Monosegmental L4/5 Stabilization for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With the Dynesys Device.
Hoppe S; Schwarzenbach O; Aghayev E; Bonel H; Berlemann U
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 26889990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization.
Morishita Y; Ohta H; Naito M; Matsumoto Y; Huang G; Tatsumi M; Takemitsu Y; Kida H
Eur Spine J; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1480-5. PubMed ID: 21301893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
Chuang WH; Lin SC; Chen SH; Wang CW; Tsai WC; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of a Posterior Lumbar Motion Stabilizing Device: In Vitro Comparison to Intact and Fused Conditions.
Perez-Orribo L; Zucherman JF; Hsu KY; Reyes PM; Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E55-63. PubMed ID: 26335667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
