160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455258)
1. Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Cancer Inform; 2008 Jan; 3():140-8. PubMed ID: 19455258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new test statistic based on shrunken sample variance for identifying differentially expressed genes in small microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Bioinform Biol Insights; 2008 Feb; 2():145-56. PubMed ID: 19812772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comprehensive evaluation of SAM, the SAM R-package and a simple modification to improve its performance.
Zhang S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():230. PubMed ID: 17603887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data.
Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of differentially expressed genes using multi-resolution wavelet transformation analysis combined with SAM.
Wu Y; Zhang L; Liu L; Zhang Y; Yi D
Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 22906473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of methods for identifying differentially expressed genes across multiple conditions from microarray data.
Tan Y; Liu Y
Bioinformation; 2011; 7(8):400-4. PubMed ID: 22347782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ranking analysis of microarray data: a powerful method for identifying differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD; Fornage M; Fu YX
Genomics; 2006 Dec; 88(6):846-854. PubMed ID: 16979869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.
Broberg P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():199. PubMed ID: 16086831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two classes of methods for estimating false discovery rates in microarray studies.
Hansen E; Kerr KF
Scientifica (Cairo); 2012; 2012():519394. PubMed ID: 24278709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
Jiao S; Zhang S
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of differential gene expression in human peripheral nerve injury.
Xiao Y; Segal MR; Rabert D; Ahn AH; Anand P; Sangameswaran L; Hu D; Hunt CA
BMC Genomics; 2002 Sep; 3(1):28. PubMed ID: 12354329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive thresholds to detect differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
Fukuoka Y; Inaoka H; Noshiro M
Bioinformation; 2011; 7(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21904436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
