158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455258)
21. Adaptive thresholds to detect differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
Fukuoka Y; Inaoka H; Noshiro M
Bioinformation; 2011; 7(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21904436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Linear mixed model selection for false discovery rate control in microarray data analysis.
Demirkale CY; Nettleton D; Maiti T
Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):621-9. PubMed ID: 19522873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimization of cDNA microarrays procedures using criteria that do not rely on external standards.
Bruland T; Anderssen E; Doseth B; Bergum H; Beisvag V; Laegreid A
BMC Genomics; 2007 Oct; 8():377. PubMed ID: 17949480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis.
Hackstadt AJ; Hess AM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():11. PubMed ID: 19133141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Chen J; Sarkar SK
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A novel approach to minimize false discovery rate in genome-wide data analysis.
Bei Y; Hong P
BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1. PubMed ID: 24564975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modifying SAMseq to account for asymmetry in the distribution of effect sizes when identifying differentially expressed genes.
Kotoka E; Orr M
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2017 Nov; 16(5-6):291-312. PubMed ID: 29077555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A mixture model approach to sample size estimation in two-sample comparative microarray experiments.
Jørstad TS; Midelfart H; Bones AM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():117. PubMed ID: 18298817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A robust statistical method for detecting differentially expressed genes.
Mathur S
Appl Bioinformatics; 2005; 4(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 16309342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A robust statistical procedure to discover expression biomarkers using microarray genomic expression data.
Zou YY; Yang J; Zhu J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Aug; 7(8):603-7. PubMed ID: 16845711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
Matsui S; Noma H
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
Gao X
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
Qian HR; Huang S
Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A statistical method for the conservative adjustment of false discovery rate (q-value).
Lai Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 3):69. PubMed ID: 28361675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Balancing false discovery and false negative rates in selection of differentially expressed genes in microarrays.
Park BS; Mori M
Open Access Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 2010(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 22022206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sample size calculation for microarray experiments with blocked one-way design.
Jung SH; Sohn I; George SL; Feng L; Leppert PC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 10():164. PubMed ID: 19476634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Q-GDEMAR: a general method for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarrays with unbalanced groups.
Guebel DV; Perera-Alberto M; Torres NV
Mol Biosyst; 2016 Jan; 12(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 26563436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
