These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455443)
21. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA. Germond M; Urner F; Chanson A; Primi MP; Wirthner D; Senn A Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2442-4. PubMed ID: 15358719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study. Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers: a prospective randomized study. Urman B; Yakin K; Ata B; Isiklar A; Balaban B Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):604-12. PubMed ID: 17936283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cumulative delivery rates in different age groups after artificial insemination with donor sperm. De Brucker M; Haentjens P; Evenepoel J; Devroey P; Collins J; Tournaye H Hum Reprod; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1891-9. PubMed ID: 19369295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [How to improve ART results? Is France behind other countries? Strategy for single embryo transfer: The value of embryo selection and embryo freezing]. Terriou P; Giorgetti C; Hans E; Salzmann J; Charles O; Cignetti L; Avon C; Roulier R Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):786-92. PubMed ID: 16950642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of fecundity after second laparotomy for endometriosis to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Cheewadhanaraks S J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Apr; 87(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 15217170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Elective single embryo transfer: a justified policy for selected patients]. Giorgetti C; Chabert-Orsini V; Barry B; Chinchole JM; Franquebalme JP; Hans E; Glowaczower E; Terriou P; Sitri MC; Salzmann J; Thibault MC; Roulier R Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Apr; 34(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 16603403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data. Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1301-5. PubMed ID: 17418827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. ; Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives. Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pregnancy loss in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not predictive of subsequent delivery in women over 40 years. Sneeringer R; Klipstein S; Ryley DA; Alper MM; Reindollar RH Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):364-7. PubMed ID: 17482171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preferences of subfertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Twisk M; van der Veen F; Repping S; Heineman MJ; Korevaar JC; Bossuyt PM Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4):1006-9. PubMed ID: 17416363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a prospective, single-operator, randomized, controlled trial. Eskandar M; Abou-Setta AM; Almushait MA; El-Amin M; Mohmad SE Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1187-90. PubMed ID: 18439602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two embryo transfer catheters in an ART program. Saldeen P; Abou-Setta AM; Bergh T; Sundström P; Holte J Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 18054000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates. van Montfoort AP; Fiddelers AA; Land JA; Dirksen CD; Severens JL; Geraedts JP; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC Hum Reprod; 2007 Jun; 22(6):1669-74. PubMed ID: 17416915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Good results of single embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization. The first follow-up report after the introduction of a new regulatory guideline]. Sundström P; Saldeen P Lakartidningen; 2004 Aug; 101(32-33):2476-8. PubMed ID: 15346620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England. Dixon S; Faghih Nasiri F; Ledger WL; Lenton EA; Duenas A; Sutcliffe P; Chilcott JB BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 18355368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Veleva Z; Karinen P; Tomás C; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1632-9. PubMed ID: 19318704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Nuclear status of day 2 preembryos affects embryo quality and implantation potential]. Liu Q; Zhu GJ; Hu J; Wei YL; Ren XL; Zhang HW; Li YF; Jin L; Yue J Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Jan; 14(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 18297807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]