These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19455855)

  • 1. Primed lexical decision task in fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Christopherson KM; Ferraro FR
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19455855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thought suppression in spider-fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Wenzel A; Barth TC; Holt CS
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):191-205. PubMed ID: 12773020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Depth of processing and recall of threat material in fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Wenzel A; Zetocha K; Ferraro FR
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17999226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Access to information about harm and safety in spider fearful and nonfearful individuals: when they were good they were very very good but when they were bad they were horrid.
    Cavanagh K; Davey G
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2003; 34(3-4):269-81. PubMed ID: 14972673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Simon effect for threat-related stimulus content.
    Schrooten MG; Smulders FT
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 17109814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To look or not to look: an eye movement study of hypervigilance during change detection in high and low spider fearful students.
    Huijding J; Mayer B; Koster EH; Muris P
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):666-74. PubMed ID: 21534662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fear-relevant change detection in spider-fearful and non-fearful participants.
    Mayer B; Muris P; Vogel L; Nojoredjo I; Merckelbach H
    J Anxiety Disord; 2006; 20(4):510-9. PubMed ID: 15955657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disgust and fear-related UCS-expectancy bias in blood-fearful individuals.
    van Overveld M; de Jong PJ; Peters ML
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2010; 17(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 19701958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of stimulus dimensions in judgement making in spider fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Cavanagh K; Davey GC
    Behav Res Ther; 2001 Oct; 39(10):1199-211. PubMed ID: 11579989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of affective words on lexical decision task in major depression.
    Stip E; Lecours AR; Chertkow H; Elie R; O'Connor K
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 1994 May; 19(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 8031744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):951-61. PubMed ID: 12219801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating implicit spider fear associations using the Go/No-go Association Task.
    Teachman BA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 17101115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time course of attentional bias for fear-relevant pictures in spider-fearful individuals.
    Mogg K; Bradley BP
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Sep; 44(9):1241-50. PubMed ID: 16870133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words.
    Ortigue S; Michel CM; Murray MM; Mohr C; Carbonnel S; Landis T
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1242-51. PubMed ID: 15050552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11958353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anxiety sensitivity: the role of conscious awareness and selective attentional bias to physical threat.
    Hunt C; Keogh E; French CC
    Emotion; 2006 Aug; 6(3):418-28. PubMed ID: 16938083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective attentional processing to fall-relevant stimuli among older adults who fear falling.
    Brown LA; White P; Doan JB; de Bruin N
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 May; 37(3):330-45. PubMed ID: 21534032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activation and measurement of threat associations in fear of spiders: an application of the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task.
    Ellwart T; Becker ES; Rinck M
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 36(4):281-99. PubMed ID: 16153389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1032-42. PubMed ID: 19695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategic and automatic threat processing in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a startle probe investigation.
    Carleton RN; Asmundson GJ; Collimore KC; Ellwanger J
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2006; 35(4):236-47. PubMed ID: 17189241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.