291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19457232)
1. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation.
Benkert P; Künzli M; Schwede T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jul; 37(Web Server issue):W510-4. PubMed ID: 19429685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs.
Randall A; Baldi P
BMC Struct Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19055744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schomburg D
Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):261-77. PubMed ID: 17932912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protein structural model selection by combining consensus and single scoring methods.
He Z; Alazmi M; Zhang J; Xu D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74006. PubMed ID: 24023923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions.
Wang K; Fain B; Levitt M; Samudrala R
BMC Struct Biol; 2004 Jun; 4():8. PubMed ID: 15207004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression.
Qiu J; Sheffler W; Baker D; Noble WS
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1175-82. PubMed ID: 18004754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving a consensus approach for protein structure selection by removing redundancy.
Wang Q; Shang Y; Xu D
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(6):1708-15. PubMed ID: 21519117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving predicted protein loop structure ranking using a Pareto-optimality consensus method.
Li Y; Rata I; Chiu SW; Jakobsson E
BMC Struct Biol; 2010 Jul; 10():22. PubMed ID: 20642859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models.
Chermak E; De Donato R; Lensink MF; Petta A; Serra L; Scarano V; Cavallo L; Oliva R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166460. PubMed ID: 27846259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2.
Ray A; Lindahl E; Wallner B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():224. PubMed ID: 22963006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models.
Benkert P; Biasini M; Schwede T
Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 27(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 21134891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QMEANDisCo-distance constraints applied on model quality estimation.
Studer G; Rempfer C; Waterhouse AM; Gumienny R; Haas J; Schwede T
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1765-1771. PubMed ID: 31697312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ab initio and template-based prediction of multi-class distance maps by two-dimensional recursive neural networks.
Walsh I; Baù D; Martin AJ; Mooney C; Vullo A; Pollastri G
BMC Struct Biol; 2009 Jan; 9():5. PubMed ID: 19183478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A sampling-based method for ranking protein structural models by integrating multiple scores and features.
Shi X; Zhang J; He Z; Shang Y; Xu D
Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 21787308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The CASP13-CAPRI targets as case studies to illustrate a novel scoring pipeline integrating CONSRANK with clustering and interface analyses.
Barradas-Bautista D; Cao Z; Cavallo L; Oliva R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 8):262. PubMed ID: 32938371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a new meta-score for protein structure prediction from seven all-atom distance dependent potentials using support vector regression.
Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
Genome Inform; 2009 Oct; 23(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 20180270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus C(alpha) contact potential.
Zhou H; Skolnick J
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1211-8. PubMed ID: 18004783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11.
Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):349-69. PubMed ID: 26344049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
