These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19457480)

  • 1. Speech perception engages a general timer: evidence from a divided attention word identification task.
    Casini L; Burle B; Nguyen N
    Cognition; 2009 Aug; 112(2):318-22. PubMed ID: 19457480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal integration during vowel identification in audiovisual speech: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Murase M; Saito DN; Kochiyama T; Tanabe HC; Tanaka S; Harada T; Aramaki Y; Honda M; Sadato N
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 18280656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syllabic priming in lexical decision and naming tasks: the syllable congruency effect re-examined in French.
    Chetail F; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19271815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tune in or tune out: age-related differences in listening to speech in music.
    Russo FA; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):746-60. PubMed ID: 18596643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fourteen-month-olds pay attention to vowels in novel words.
    Mani N; Plunkett K
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18171367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and perceptual regularity in speech.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1643-7. PubMed ID: 19907350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between- and within-ear congruency and laterality effects in an auditory semantic/emotional prosody conflict task.
    Techentin C; Voyer D; Klein RM
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Jul; 70(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 19303185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical effects on auditory speech perception: an electrophysiological study.
    van Linden S; Stekelenburg JJ; Tuomainen J; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun; 420(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 17475404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceiving the speech of multiple concurrent talkers in a combined divided and selective attention task.
    Shafiro V; Gygi B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):EL229-35. PubMed ID: 18247646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The shift in infant preferences for vowel duration and pitch contour between 6 and 10 months of age.
    Kitamura C; Notley A
    Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):706-14. PubMed ID: 19702763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: evidence for bottom-up and top-down effects on spoken word processing.
    Newman RL; Connolly JF
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 18524453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese.
    Lengeris A
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):169-87. PubMed ID: 19776666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words.
    Fernandes M; Guild E
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 19271812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19207193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre-attentive perception of vowel phonemes from variable speech stimuli.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Alter K
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jul; 41(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 15189488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.
    Ziegler JC; Pech-Georgel C; George F; Lorenzi C
    Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):732-45. PubMed ID: 19702766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing interactions between phonology and melody: vowels sing but consonants speak.
    Kolinsky R; Lidji P; Peretz I; Besson M; Morais J
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 19409537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.