139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19457486)
1. On prediction of the strength levels and failure patterns of human vertebrae using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
Mirzaei M; Zeinali A; Razmjoo A; Nazemi M
J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(11):1584-91. PubMed ID: 19457486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.
Zeinali A; Hashemi B; Akhlaghpoor S
Phys Med; 2010 Apr; 26(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 19781969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of 3D QCT scan protocol on the QCT-based finite element models of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Huber G
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Aug; 36(8):1069-73. PubMed ID: 24894031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Specimen-specific vertebral fracture modeling: a feasibility study using the extended finite element method.
Giambini H; Qin X; Dragomir-Daescu D; An KN; Nassr A
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Apr; 54(4):583-93. PubMed ID: 26239163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of the vertebral strength using a finite element model derived from low-dose biplanar imaging: benefits of subject-specific material properties.
Sapin-de Brosses E; Jolivet E; Travert C; Mitton D; Skalli W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E156-62. PubMed ID: 22290213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.
Choisne J; Valiadis JM; Travert C; Kolta S; Roux C; Skalli W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():190-196. PubMed ID: 30077078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative computed tomography-based predictions of vertebral strength in anterior bending.
Buckley JM; Cheng L; Loo K; Slyfield C; Xu Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1019-27. PubMed ID: 17450078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: how much spatial resolution is needed?
Bauer JS; Sidorenko I; Mueller D; Baum T; Issever AS; Eckstein F; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Raeth CW
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 24274992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A nonlinear finite element model validation study based on a novel experimental technique for inducing anterior wedge-shape fractures in human vertebral bodies in vitro.
Dall'Ara E; Schmidt R; Pahr D; Varga P; Chevalier Y; Patsch J; Kainberger F; Zysset P
J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2374-80. PubMed ID: 20462582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of in situ/in vitro three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography image voxel size on the finite element model of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Glueer CC; Morlock MM; Huber G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1208-13. PubMed ID: 25500865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of strength and failure pattern of human proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element method.
Mirzaei M; Keshavarzian M; Naeini V
Bone; 2014 Jul; 64():108-14. PubMed ID: 24735974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analyses of human vertebral bodies embedded in polymethylmethalcrylate or loaded via the hyperelastic intervertebral disc models provide equivalent predictions of experimental strength.
Lu Y; Maquer G; Museyko O; Püschel K; Engelke K; Zysset P; Morlock M; Huber G
J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2512-6. PubMed ID: 24818795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
Crawford RP; Cann CE; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2003 Oct; 33(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 14555280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dependence of anisotropy of human lumbar vertebral trabecular bone on quantitative computed tomography-based apparent density.
Aiyangar AK; Vivanco J; Au AG; Anderson PA; Smith EL; Ploeg HL
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Sep; 136(9):091003. PubMed ID: 24825322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonlinear finite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site.
Imai K; Ohnishi I; Bessho M; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(16):1789-94. PubMed ID: 16845352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element model.
Imai K; Ohnishi I; Yamamoto S; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18165745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.
Buckley JM; Loo K; Motherway J
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 17174619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional modeling of the effects of parathyroid hormone on bone distribution in lumbar vertebrae of ovariectomized cynomolgus macaques.
Sato M; Westmore M; Clendenon J; Smith S; Hannum B; Zeng GQ; Brommage R; Turner CH
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(10):871-80. PubMed ID: 11199192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Building an effective nonlinear three-dimensional finite-element model of human thoracolumbar spine].
Zeng ZL; Cheng LM; Zhu R; Wang JJ; Yu Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(31):2176-80. PubMed ID: 22094033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
