BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19457600)

  • 1. Challenges in radioecology.
    Salbu B
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1086-91. PubMed ID: 19457600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speciation of radionuclides - analytical challenges within environmental impact and risk assessments.
    Salbu B
    J Environ Radioact; 2007; 96(1-3):47-53. PubMed ID: 17475374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental impact and risk assessments and key factors contributing to the overall uncertainties.
    Salbu B
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():352-60. PubMed ID: 26546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transport and fate of radionuclides in aquatic environments--the use of ecosystem modelling for exposure assessments of nuclear facilities.
    Kumblad L; Kautsky U; Naeslund B
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):107-29. PubMed ID: 16406229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer of radionuclides in aquatic ecosystems--default concentration ratios for aquatic biota in the Erica Tool.
    Hosseini A; Thørring H; Brown JE; Saxén R; Ilus E
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1408-29. PubMed ID: 18343543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radionuclide speciation and its relevance in environmental impact assessments.
    Salbu B; Lind OC; Skipperud L
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 74(1-3):233-42. PubMed ID: 15063551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is the multiple stressor concept of relevance to radioecology?
    Salbu B; Teien HC; Lind OC; Tollefsen KE
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2019 Jul; 95(7):1015-1024. PubMed ID: 30971149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Watershed wash-off of atmospherically deposited radionuclides: review of the fluxes and their evolution with time.
    Garcia-Sanchez L
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Apr; 99(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 18155329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management.
    Moore MN; Depledge MH; Readman JW; Paul Leonard DR
    Mutat Res; 2004 Aug; 552(1-2):247-68. PubMed ID: 15288556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Intergrated assessment of the radioecological state of the biota in Moscow water objects].
    Shatokhin AM; Shmonov MG; Krasotkin VA; Umniashova EE; Nikiforova SE; Zozul' IuN
    Gig Sanit; 2009; (1):25-8. PubMed ID: 19354183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental monitoring and radioecology: a necessary synergy.
    Vandecasteele CM
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 72(1-2):17-23. PubMed ID: 15162851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment to a generic high-level waste disposal site.
    Agüero A; Pinedo P; Simón I; Cancio D; Moraleda M; Trueba C; Pérez-Sánchez D
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):34-58. PubMed ID: 18614203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment.
    Jones D; Domotor S; Higley K; Kocher D; Bilyard G
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):19-39. PubMed ID: 12590068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ambient environmental profile for the Savannah River Site.
    Rollins EM
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18545030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiological risk assessment and biosphere modelling for radioactive waste disposal in Switzerland.
    Brennwald MS; van Dorp F
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1058-61. PubMed ID: 19560845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct methods for radionuclides measurement in water environment.
    Chernyaev A; Gaponov I; Kazennov A
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 72(1-2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15162871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marine radioecology after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident: Are we better positioned to understand the impact of radionuclides in marine ecosystems?
    Vives I Batlle J; Aoyama M; Bradshaw C; Brown J; Buesseler KO; Casacuberta N; Christl M; Duffa C; Impens NREN; Iosjpe M; Masqué P; Nishikawa J
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Mar; 618():80-92. PubMed ID: 29127871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radioecological studies at the Kraton-3 underground nuclear explosion site in 1978-2007: a review.
    Ramzaev V; Mishin A; Golikov V; Argunova T; Ushnitski V; Zhuravskaya A; Sobakin P; Brown J; Strand P
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1092-9. PubMed ID: 19446936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twenty-five-year study of radionuclides in the Susquehanna river via periphyton biomonitors.
    Patrick R; Palms J; Kreeger D; Harris C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17164593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.