These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19457787)

  • 21. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abdominal Radiography With Digital Tomosynthesis: An Alternative to Computed Tomography for Identification of Urinary Calculi?
    Wollin DA; Gupta RT; Young B; Cone E; Kaplan A; Marin D; Patel BN; Mazurowski MA; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    Urology; 2018 Oct; 120():56-61. PubMed ID: 30006268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a flat panel digital radiographic system for low-dose portable imaging of neonates.
    Samei E; Hill JG; Frey GD; Southgate WM; Mah E; Delong D
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 12722812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lung lesions.
    Uffmann M; Prokop M; Eisenhuber E; Fuchsjäger M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2005 May; 40(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 15829821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differentiation of urinary calculi with dual energy CT: effect of spectral shaping by high energy tin filtration.
    Thomas C; Krauss B; Ketelsen D; Tsiflikas I; Reimann A; Werner M; Schilling D; Hennenlotter J; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP; Heuschmid M
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jul; 45(7):393-8. PubMed ID: 20440214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
    Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
    Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone disease - Impact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters.
    Dewes P; Frellesen C; Scholtz JE; Fischer S; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW; Schulz B
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1058-62. PubMed ID: 27161052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic efficiency of split-bolus dual-energy computed tomography for patients with suspected urinary stones.
    Yeo YJ; Kim SH; Kim MJ; Kim YH; Cho SH; Lee EJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 25247691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
    Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of radiation dose estimates and scan performance in pediatric high-resolution thoracic CT for volumetric 320-detector row, helical 64-detector row, and noncontiguous axial scan acquisitions.
    Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Brody AS; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):1152-61. PubMed ID: 23931430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.
    Gudjónsdóttir J; Ween B; Olsen DR
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20207787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CT dose: medical residents take note.
    Slothus RJ
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):112. PubMed ID: 21048061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
    Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.