BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

947 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19458344)

  • 1. Medicaid nursing home pay for performance: where do we stand?
    Arling G; Job C; Cooke V
    Gerontologist; 2009 Oct; 49(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 19458344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing home performance under case-mix reimbursement: responding to heavy-care incentives and market changes.
    Davis MA; Freeman JW; Kirby EC
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 1):815-34. PubMed ID: 9776938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State adoption of nursing home pay-for-performance.
    Werner RM; Tamara Konetzka R; Liang K
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Jun; 67(3):364-77. PubMed ID: 19923629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of pay-for-performance in nursing homes: evidence from state Medicaid programs.
    Werner RM; Konetzka RT; Polsky D
    Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 48(4):1393-414. PubMed ID: 23398330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data quality bias: an underrecognized source of misclassification in pay-for-performance reporting?
    Terris DD; Litaker DG
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18204374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minnesota's Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payment Program: an innovative model for promoting care quality.
    Cooke V; Arling G; Lewis T; Abrahamson KA; Mueller C; Edstrom L
    Gerontologist; 2010 Aug; 50(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 19846473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nursing home consumer complaints and quality of care: a national view.
    Stevenson DG
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Jun; 63(3):347-68. PubMed ID: 16651397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pay-for-performance in orthopedics: implications for clinical practice.
    Bozic KJ; Smith AR; Mauerhan DR
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):8-12. PubMed ID: 17823006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nursing home administrators' opinions of pay for performance.
    Castle NG; Engberg J; Ferguson-Rome JC; Sonon K
    J Aging Soc Policy; 2014; 26(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 24716862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Evaluation of Performance Thresholds in Nursing Home Pay-for-Performance.
    Werner RM; Skira M; Konetzka RT
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Dec; 51(6):2282-2304. PubMed ID: 26932527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Florida's efforts to improve quality of nursing home care through nurse staffing standards, regulation, and Medicaid reimbursement.
    Hyer K; Temple A; Johnson CE
    J Aging Soc Policy; 2009; 21(4):318-37. PubMed ID: 20092125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pay for performance in Medicare: evidentiary irony and the politics of value.
    Tanenbaum SJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2009 Oct; 34(5):717-46. PubMed ID: 19778930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaction effect of Medicaid census and nursing home characteristics on quality of psychosocial care for residents.
    Kang-Yi CD; Mandell DS; Mui AC; Castle NG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2011; 36(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 21157230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nursing home performance in resident care in the United States: is it only a matter of for-profit versus not-for-profit?
    Decker FH
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2008 Apr; 3(Pt 2):115-40. PubMed ID: 18634624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The pay-off on nursing home report cards.
    Werner RM; Polsky D; Konetzka RT
    LDI Issue Brief; 2011 Apr; 16(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 21688691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resident, nursing home, and state factors affecting the reliability of Minimum Data Set quality measures.
    Wu N; Mor V; Roy J
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 19372542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The response of physician groups to P4P incentives.
    Mehrotra A; Pearson SD; Coltin KL; Kleinman KP; Singer JA; Rabson B; Schneider EC
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 May; 13(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 17488190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pay-for-performance in safety net settings: issues, opportunities, and challenges for the future.
    Young G; Meterko M; White B; Sautter K; Bokhour B; Baker E; Silver J
    J Healthc Manag; 2010; 55(2):132-41; discussion 141-2. PubMed ID: 20402368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician-level P4P--DOA? Can quality-based payment be resuscitated?
    McMahon LF; Hofer TP; Hayward RA
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 May; 13(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 17488186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.