These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19458598)

  • 21. Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans.
    Broderick M; Leech M; Coffey M
    Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 4():8. PubMed ID: 19220906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
    Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing software upgrades, plan properties and patient geometry using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) complexity metrics.
    McGarry CK; Chinneck CD; O'Toole MM; O'Sullivan JM; Prise KM; Hounsell AR
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2027-34. PubMed ID: 21626935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A feedback constraint optimization method for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Li Y; Sun X; Wang QI; Zhou Q; Gu B; Shi G; Jiang D
    Oncol Lett; 2015 Oct; 10(4):2043-2050. PubMed ID: 26622793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct aperture optimization for IMRT using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
    Bergman AM; Bush K; Milette MP; Popescu IA; Otto K; Duzenli C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3666-79. PubMed ID: 17089832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.
    Kantz S; Söhn M; Troeller A; Reiner M; Weingandt H; Alber M; Belka C; Ganswindt U
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():184. PubMed ID: 26328628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
    Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the Elekta Agility MLC performance using high-resolution log files.
    Kabat CN; Defoor DL; Myers P; Kirby N; Rasmussen K; Saenz DL; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1397-1407. PubMed ID: 30702748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of beamlet step-size on IMRT plan quality.
    Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Earl M; Yu C
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3448-54. PubMed ID: 16370431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An empirical model of electronic portal imager response implemented within a commercial treatment planning system for verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields.
    Khan RFH; Ostapiak OZ; Szabo JJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 9(4):135-150. PubMed ID: 19020485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
    Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk.
    Bratengeier K; Holubyev K
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():207. PubMed ID: 26458947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans--Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system.
    Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Benedek H; Nilsson P; Knöös T
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3130-8. PubMed ID: 21815387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
    Ludlum E; Xia P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct leaf trajectory optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning with sliding window delivery.
    Papp D; Unkelbach J
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011701. PubMed ID: 24387493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
    Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
    Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dosimetric evaluation of conventional radiotherapy, 3-D conformal radiotherapy and direct machine parameter optimisation intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer after conservative surgery.
    Zhang F; Zheng M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 22141607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Voxel-based automatic multi-criteria optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Mai Y; Kong F; Yang Y; Zhou L; Li Y; Song T
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30518381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of anatomy-based, fluence-based and aperture-based treatment planning approaches for VMAT.
    Rao M; Cao D; Chen F; Ye J; Mehta V; Wong T; Shepard D
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6475-90. PubMed ID: 20959688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
    Kierkels RG; Visser R; Bijl HP; Langendijk JA; van 't Veld AA; Steenbakkers RJ; Korevaar EW
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():87. PubMed ID: 25885444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.