These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19459835)

  • 1. A likelihood-based trait-model-free approach for linkage detection of binary trait.
    Basu S; Stephens M; Pankow JS; Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 19459835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact trait-model-free tests for linkage detection in pedigrees.
    Basu S; Di Y; Thompson EA
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Sep; 72(Pt 5):676-82. PubMed ID: 18507652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests.
    Kong A; Cox NJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Nov; 61(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9345087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MCMC multilocus lod scores: application of a new approach.
    George AW; Wijsman EM; Thompson EA
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 15838179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MCMC-based linkage analysis for complex traits on general pedigrees: multipoint analysis with a two-locus model and a polygenic component.
    Sung YJ; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17123301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method of linkage analysis using LOD scores for quantitative traits supports linkage of monoamine oxidase activity to D17S250 in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism pedigrees.
    Curtis D; Knight J; Sham PC
    Psychiatr Genet; 2005 Sep; 15(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 16094252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative model for quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis in general pedigrees.
    Basu S; Pankow JS
    Ann Hum Genet; 2011 Mar; 75(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 21091451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-Based Linkage Analysis of a Quantitative Trait.
    Song YE; Song S; Schnell AH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():283-310. PubMed ID: 28980251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Xu W; Ma J; Greenwood CMT; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():343-373. PubMed ID: 28980254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-Based Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Cantor RM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():311-326. PubMed ID: 28980252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.
    Sun L; Cox NJ; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 11791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene-trait similarity regression for multimarker-based association analysis.
    Tzeng JY; Zhang D; Chang SM; Thomas DC; Davidian M
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):822-32. PubMed ID: 19210740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computationally efficient multipoint linkage analysis on extended pedigrees for trait models with two contributing major Loci.
    Su M; Thompson EA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 36(6):602-11. PubMed ID: 22740194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SUP: an extension to SLINK to allow a larger number of marker loci to be simulated in pedigrees conditional on trait values.
    Lemire M
    BMC Genet; 2006 Jul; 7():40. PubMed ID: 16803631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A follow-up linkage study for quantitative trait loci contributing to obesity-related phenotypes.
    Liu YJ; Xu FH; Shen H; Liu YZ; Deng HY; Zhao LJ; Huang QY; Dvornyk V; Conway T; Davies KM; Li JL; Recker RR; Deng HW
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2004 Feb; 89(2):875-82. PubMed ID: 14764808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of multipoint likelihoods using flanking marker data: a simulation study.
    George AW; Mangin LA; Bartlett CW; Logue MW; Segre AM; Vieland VJ
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44. PubMed ID: 16451655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for epistasis in linkage analysis of general pedigrees.
    Sung YJ; Wijsman EM
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 17283443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits.
    Schork NJ; Boehnke M; Terwilliger JD; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Nov; 53(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 8213836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A likelihood approach for quantitative-trait-locus mapping with selected pedigrees.
    Wang K
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 16011693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.