149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19459889)
1. On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how.
Nelson MP; Vucetich JA
Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1090-101. PubMed ID: 19459889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.
Wolpe PR
Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(6):1023-5. PubMed ID: 16777590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carbon sequestration, the precautionary approach and the responsibility of scientists.
Buhl-Mortensen L; Myhr A; Welin S
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):205-12. PubMed ID: 16304953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Science, scientists, and policy advocacy.
Lackey RT
Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17298504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Emergency medicine and environmental activism.
Couser G
Emerg Med Australas; 2004; 16(5-6):469-72. PubMed ID: 15537412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Between a rock and a soft place: developmental research and the child advocacy process.
Grisso T; Steinberg L
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 34(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 16232059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific practice and the tradition of advocacy in special education.
Brigham FJ; Gustashaw WE; Brigham MS
J Learn Disabil; 2004; 37(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 15495658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The advocacy and science divide.
Wright DH
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):901-2. PubMed ID: 17650234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why promote campaigns for clean products and clean production?
Geiser K
New Solut; 1999; 9(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17208802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precaution, environmental science, and preventive public policy.
Tickner JA
New Solut; 2003; 13(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 17208730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Science, scientists, and responsibility.
Shine KI
Mt Sinai J Med; 1993 Jan; 60(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 8426604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sampling designs, pseudoreplication and a good practice in modern science: a response to Mikhail V. Kozlov desultoriness, and recommendations to environmental scientists.
Velicković MV
Hereditas; 2007 Mar; 144(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 17567440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The advocacy and science divide.
Czech B
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):902-3. PubMed ID: 17650235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science or science fiction?
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2005 May; 12(5):381. PubMed ID: 15870722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How ethics shape the policy preferences of environmental scientists: What we can learn from Lomborg and his critics.
Balint PJ
Politics Life Sci; 2003 Mar; 22(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 16859357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social advocacy and helping others are fundamental to nursing.
Oulton JA
Int Nurs Rev; 2006 Dec; 53(4):250. PubMed ID: 17083411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The responsibility of science to society; with reference to the charter of the International Federation of Scientists].
METTE A
Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1958 Jun; 13(23):701-5. PubMed ID: 13585893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientists enter the blogosphere.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2007 May; 129(3):443-5. PubMed ID: 17482534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why anatomical scientists need to practice science advocacy.
Olds JL
Anat Rec; 1999 Dec; 257(6):183-4. PubMed ID: 10620745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychic drift. Why most scientists do not believe in ESP and psi phenomena.
Shermer M
Sci Am; 2003 Feb; 288(2):31. PubMed ID: 12561455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
