These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19460408)

  • 21. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
    Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An interlaboratory study of the short time exposure (STE) test using SIRC cells for predicting eye irritation potential.
    Takahashi Y; Hayashi T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Kuwahara H; Nishiyama N
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Jun; 29(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 20178401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for assessing ocular irritation.
    Kruszewski FH; Walker TL; DiPasquale LC
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1997 Apr; 36(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 9143482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lacking applicability of in vitro eye irritation methods to identify seriously eye irritating agrochemical formulations: Results of bovine cornea opacity and permeability assay, isolated chicken eye test and the EpiOcular™ ET-50 method to classify according to UN GHS.
    Kolle SN; Van Cott A; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():33-47. PubMed ID: 28163171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS).
    Scheel J; Kleber M; Kreutz J; Lehringer E; Mehling A; Reisinger K; Steiling W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 21310206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test.
    Lagarto A; Vega R; Vega Y; Guerra I; González R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 16293391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comments on the LD50 and acute eye and skin irritation tests. The Animals in Research Committee of the Society of Toxicology and approved by the SOT Council.
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1989 Nov; 13(4):621-3. PubMed ID: 2620785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The status of eye irritancy testing: a regulatory perspective.
    Wilcox NL
    Lens Eye Toxic Res; 1992; 9(3-4):259-71. PubMed ID: 1301785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: eye irritation.
    McNamee P; Hibatallah J; Costabel-Farkas M; Goebel C; Araki D; Dufour E; Hewitt NJ; Jones P; Kirst A; Le Varlet B; Macfarlane M; Marrec-Fairley M; Rowland J; Schellauf F; Scheel J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 19393279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of in vitro eye irritation potential by bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay to erythema scores in human eye sting test of surfactant-based formulations.
    Cater KC; Harbell JW
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 18568892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new 3D reconstituted human corneal epithelium model as an alternative method for the eye irritation test.
    Jung KM; Lee SH; Ryu YH; Jang WH; Jung HS; Han JH; Seok SH; Park JH; Son Y; Park YH; Lim KM
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Feb; 25(1):403-10. PubMed ID: 21040779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. IRAG working group 1. Organotypic models for the assessment/prediction of ocular irritation. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group.
    Chamberlain M; Gad SC; Gautheron P; Prinsen MK
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 9100813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of HET-CAM test in detecting the ocular irritation.
    Tavaszi J; Budai P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 18399434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals.
    Van Goethem F; Adriaens E; Alépée N; Straube F; De Wever B; Cappadoro M; Catoire S; Hansen E; Wolf A; Vanparys P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Feb; 20(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of skin and eye irritation of 14 products under the stepwise approach of the OECD.
    Mancebo A; Hernández O; González Y; Aldana L; Carballo O
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(3):173-85. PubMed ID: 18988087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Short Time Exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential: intra-laboratory reproducibility and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) and EU eye irritation classification for 109 chemicals.
    Takahashi Y; Hayashi K; Abo T; Koike M; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1425-34. PubMed ID: 21513790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reconstituted human corneal epithelium: a new alternative to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals and cosmetic products.
    Doucet O; Lanvin M; Thillou C; Linossier C; Pupat C; Merlin B; Zastrow L
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):499-512. PubMed ID: 16243479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative studies on the ocular and dermal irritation potential of surfactants.
    Mehling A; Kleber M; Hensen H
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 May; 45(5):747-58. PubMed ID: 17169473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [In vitro alternatives to Draize eye irritation test].
    Zhou J; Yang M; Yang X; He X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 Jul; 33(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 15461295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cytotoxicity of chemicals used in household products: estimation of eye irritating potency of 25 chemicals tested during 1991-1996].
    Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 1997; (115):130-4. PubMed ID: 9641827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.