1075 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19460503)
1. Prospective clinical trial comparing two immunosuppressive regimens, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine, in de novo renal transplant recipients: results at 6 months follow-up.
Favi E; Citterio F; Spagnoletti G; Gargiulo A; Delreno F; Romagnoli J; Castagneto M
Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1152-5. PubMed ID: 19460503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant recipients treated with two immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine.
Spagnoletti G; Citterio F; Favi E; Rossi E; Delreno F; De Santis I; Salerno MP; Gargiulo A; Castagneto M
Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1175-7. PubMed ID: 19460509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three-yr results of a single-center prospective clinical trial.
Favi E; Spagnoletti G; Salerno MP; Pedroso JA; Romagnoli J; Citterio F
Clin Transplant; 2013; 27(4):E359-67. PubMed ID: 23710603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decreased acute rejection and improved renal allograft survival using sirolimus and low-dose calcineurin inhibitors without induction therapy.
Tsai MK; Wu FL; Lai IR; Lee CY; Hu RH; Lee PH
Int J Artif Organs; 2009 Jun; 32(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 19670189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes.
Anil Kumar MS; Irfan Saeed M; Ranganna K; Malat G; Sustento-Reodica N; Kumar AM; Meyers WC
Transpl Immunol; 2008 Nov; 20(1-2):32-42. PubMed ID: 18773960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An open-label, randomized trial indicates that everolimus with tacrolimus or cyclosporine is comparable to standard immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant patients.
Sommerer C; Suwelack B; Dragun D; Schenker P; Hauser IA; Witzke O; Hugo C; Kamar N; Merville P; Junge M; Thaiss F; Nashan B;
Kidney Int; 2019 Jul; 96(1):231-244. PubMed ID: 31027892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pilot Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus/Everolimus vs Tacrolimus/Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Adult, Primary Kidney Transplant Recipients at a Single Center.
Ciancio G; Tryphonopoulos P; Gaynor JJ; Guerra G; Sageshima J; Roth D; Chen L; Kupin W; Mattiazzi A; Tueros L; Flores S; Hanson L; Powell RH; Ruiz P; Vianna R; Burke GW
Transplant Proc; 2016; 48(6):2006-10. PubMed ID: 27569936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
Lehmkuhl HB; Arizon J; Viganò M; Almenar L; Gerosa G; Maccherini M; Varnous S; Musumeci F; Hexham JM; Mange KC; Livi U;
Transplantation; 2009 Jul; 88(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19584690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. De novo sirolimus with low-dose tacrolimus versus full-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil after heart transplantation--8-year results.
Guethoff S; Stroeh K; Grinninger C; Koenig MA; Kleinert EC; Rieger A; Mayr T; von Ziegler F; Reichart B; Hagl C; Schramm R; Kaczmarek I; Meiser BM
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2015 May; 34(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 25701373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaction between everolimus and tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: a pharmacokinetic controlled trial.
Pascual J; del Castillo D; Cabello M; Pallardó L; Grinyó JM; Fernández AM; Brunet M
Transplantation; 2010 Apr; 89(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 20335831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
Bara C; Dengler T; Hack MA; Ladenburger S; Lehmkuhl HB
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2387-92. PubMed ID: 23953553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine versus full-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate in de novo renal transplant patients: a 2-year single-center experience.
Santos SM; Carlos CM; Cabanayan-Casasola CB; Danguilan RA
Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):154-60. PubMed ID: 22310603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanistic analyses in kidney transplant recipients prospectively randomized to two steroid free regimen-Low dose Tacrolimus with Everolimus versus standard dose Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil.
Traitanon O; Mathew JM; Shetty A; Bontha SV; Maluf DG; El Kassis Y; Park SH; Han J; Ansari MJ; Leventhal JR; Mas V; Gallon L
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216300. PubMed ID: 31136582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal everolimus concentration is associated with risk reduction for acute rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients.
Chan L; Hartmann E; Cibrik D; Cooper M; Shaw LM
Transplantation; 2010 Jul; 90(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20517177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.
Stegall MD; Wachs ME; Everson G; Steinberg T; Bilir B; Shrestha R; Karrer F; Kam I
Transplantation; 1997 Dec; 64(12):1755-60. PubMed ID: 9422416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Good outcomes with cyclosporine very low exposure with everolimus high exposure in renal transplant patients.
Bertoni E; Larti A; Rosso G; Zanazzi M; Di Maria L; Salvadori M
J Nephrol; 2011; 24(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 21240873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term kidney allograft function and survival in prednisone-free regimens: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus.
Chhabra D; Skaro AI; Leventhal JR; Dalal P; Shah G; Wang E; Gallon L
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2012 Mar; 7(3):504-12. PubMed ID: 22282478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New strategies using 'low-dose' mycophenolate mofetil to reduce acute rejection in patients following kidney transplantation.
Ulsh PJ; Yang HC; Holman MJ; Ahsan N
J Transpl Coord; 1999 Jun; 9(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 10703393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and rationale of the ATHENA study--A 12-month, multicentre, prospective study evaluating the outcomes of a de novo everolimus-based regimen in combination with reduced cyclosporine or tacrolimus versus a standard regimen in kidney transplant patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Sommerer C; Suwelack B; Dragun D; Schenker P; Hauser IA; Nashan B; Thaiss F
Trials; 2016 Feb; 17():92. PubMed ID: 26888217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and efficacy of the early introduction of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine a in de novo kidney recipients.
Oh CK; Huh KH; Ha J; Kim YH; Kim YL; Kim YS
Transplantation; 2015 Jan; 99(1):180-6. PubMed ID: 24983307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
