175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19460890)
1. Predictor correlation impacts machine learning algorithms: implications for genomic studies.
Nicodemus KK; Malley JD
Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(15):1884-90. PubMed ID: 19460890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The behaviour of random forest permutation-based variable importance measures under predictor correlation.
Nicodemus KK; Malley JD; Strobl C; Ziegler A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():110. PubMed ID: 20187966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure.
Altmann A; Toloşi L; Sander O; Lengauer T
Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(10):1340-7. PubMed ID: 20385727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random forest Gini importance favours SNPs with large minor allele frequency: impact, sources and recommendations.
Boulesteix AL; Bender A; Lorenzo Bermejo J; Strobl C
Brief Bioinform; 2012 May; 13(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 21908865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive rule inference for epistatic interaction detection in genome-wide association studies.
Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Xue H; Tang NL; Yu W
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 19880365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Weighted rank aggregation of cluster validation measures: a Monte Carlo cross-entropy approach.
Pihur V; Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1607-15. PubMed ID: 17483500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SNPHarvester: a filtering-based approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.
Yang C; He Z; Wan X; Yang Q; Xue H; Yu W
Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 19098029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current bioinformatics tools in genomic biomedical research (Review).
Teufel A; Krupp M; Weinmann A; Galle PR
Int J Mol Med; 2006 Jun; 17(6):967-73. PubMed ID: 16685403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of the phenotypic effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms using structural and evolutionary information.
Bao L; Cui Y
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2185-90. PubMed ID: 15746281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes.
Sha N; Tadesse MG; Vannucci M
Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2262-8. PubMed ID: 16845144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of potential power gain with imputed genotypes in genome-wide association studies.
Becker T; Flaquer A; Brockschmidt FF; Herold C; Steffens M
Hum Hered; 2009; 68(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 19339783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests.
Bureau A; Dupuis J; Falls K; Lunetta KL; Hayward B; Keith TP; Van Eerdewegh P
Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 28(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 15593090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic test bed for feature selection.
Choudhary A; Brun M; Hua J; Lowey J; Suh E; Dougherty ER
Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(7):837-42. PubMed ID: 16428263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules.
Hua J; Xiong Z; Lowey J; Suh E; Dougherty ER
Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1509-15. PubMed ID: 15572470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discerning static and causal interactions in genome-wide reverse engineering problems.
Zampieri M; Soranzo N; Altafini C
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(13):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18467346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome simulation approaches for synthesizing in silico datasets for human genomics.
Ritchie MD; Bush WS
Adv Genet; 2010; 72():1-24. PubMed ID: 21029846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing association network algorithms for reverse engineering of large-scale gene regulatory networks: synthetic versus real data.
Soranzo N; Bianconi G; Altafini C
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1640-7. PubMed ID: 17485431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MSMAD: a computationally efficient method for the analysis of noisy array CGH data.
Budinska E; Gelnarova E; Schimek MG
Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar; 25(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 19147666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
