BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19460950)

  • 1. Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories.
    Scullin MK; Einstein GO; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 19460950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1232-40. PubMed ID: 21557005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection.
    Clark-Foos A; Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Cook GI
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 19353934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions.
    Rummel J; Einstein GO; Rampey H
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):803-17. PubMed ID: 22897132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 20053054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental tests of prospective remembering: the influence of cue-event frequency on performance.
    Ellis J; Kvavilashvili L; Milne A
    Br J Psychol; 1999 Feb; 90 ( Pt 1)():9-23. PubMed ID: 10085543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT; Lee JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):736-49. PubMed ID: 20438269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning is impaired by activated intentions.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Clark-Foos A; Meeks JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17546738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1037-45. PubMed ID: 17128602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 27172855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.
    Breneiser JE; McDaniel MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 17328382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory.
    Thadeus Meeks J; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):997-1004. PubMed ID: 17052920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fate of completed intentions.
    Anderson FT; Einstein GO
    Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):467-480. PubMed ID: 27206804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
    Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intention formation induces episodic inhibition of distracting stimuli.
    Veling H; van Knippenberg A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 17991450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do.
    Besner D; Care S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 57(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 14710868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT
    Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):55-71. PubMed ID: 23916951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.