These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19460956)

  • 1. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causal judgment from contingency information: the interpretation of factors common to all instances.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1083-102. PubMed ID: 11009246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 15285120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymptotic judgment of cause in a relative validity paradigm.
    Baker AG; Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):466-79. PubMed ID: 10881563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human judgments of positive and negative causal chains.
    Baetu I; Baker AG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 19364225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal judgment as evaluation of evidence: the use of confirmation and disconfirmatory information.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):491-513. PubMed ID: 12814099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment.
    White PA
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of contingency and contiguity in young and older adults' causal learning.
    Mutter SA; DeCaro MS; Plumlee LF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2009 May; 64(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 19299255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.