171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19461326)
1. The use of polymer scaffolds in skeletal tissue engineering applications.
Gupta DM; Panetta NJ; Longaker MT
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):860-1. PubMed ID: 19461326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of in vivo properties of hydroxyapatite-polyhydroxybutyrate composites assessed for bone substitution.
Carlo EC; Borges AP; Del Carlo RJ; Martinez MM; Oliveira PM; Morato GO; Eleotério RB; Reis Júnior MS
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 19461325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biologic augmentation of polymer scaffolds for bone repair.
Guldberg RE; Oest ME; Dupont K; Peister A; Deutsch E; Kolambkar Y; Mooney D
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(4):333-4. PubMed ID: 18094499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone tissue engineering.
Healy KE; Guldberg RE
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 18094496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Overview and perspective of mandibular reconstruction].
Zwetyenga N
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Jun; 110(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 19403147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D Printed Poly(𝜀-caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study on a Composite Preparation by Melt Blending or Solvent Casting Techniques and the Influence of Bioceramic Content on Scaffold Properties.
Biscaia S; Branquinho MV; Alvites RD; Fonseca R; Sousa AC; Pedrosa SS; Caseiro AR; Guedes F; Patrício T; Viana T; Mateus A; Maurício AC; Alves N
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35216432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with iliac crest grafts and endosteal implants: a report of two cases.
O'Connell JE; Galvin M; Kearns G
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 19928372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of osteogenic potential between apatite-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite particulates and Bio-Oss.
Kim SS; Kim BS
Dent Mater J; 2008 May; 27(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 18717164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perspectives in cell-based skeletal tissue.
Panetta NJ; Gupta DM; Longaker MT
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):347-8. PubMed ID: 19305243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternatives to Autologous Bone Graft in Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction: The State of Alveolar Tissue Engineering.
Liang F; Leland H; Jedrzejewski B; Auslander A; Maniskas S; Swanson J; Urata M; Hammoudeh J; Magee W
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 May; 29(3):584-593. PubMed ID: 29461365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biocomposite scaffolds containing regenerated silk fibroin and nanohydroxyapatite for bone tissue regeneration.
Agapov II; Moisenovich MM; Druzhinina TV; Kamenchuk YA; Trofimov KV; Vasilyeva TV; Konkov AS; Arhipova AY; Sokolova OS; Guzeev VV; Kirpichnikov MP
Dokl Biochem Biophys; 2011; 440():228-30. PubMed ID: 22095126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone regeneration graft materials.
Hoexter DL
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):290-4. PubMed ID: 12498538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental study on bone formation potential of cryopreserved human bone marrow mesenchymal cell/hydroxyapatite complex in the presence of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
Shimakura Y; Yamzaki Y; Uchinuma E
J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 12544232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of space-filling materials in subantral bone augmentation: blood clot vs. autogenous bone chips vs. bovine hydroxyapatite.
Lambert F; Léonard A; Drion P; Sourice S; Layrolle P; Rompen E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 21198906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparation and characterization of a multilayer biomimetic scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Kong L; Ao Q; Wang A; Gong K; Wang X; Lu G; Gong Y; Zhao N; Zhang X
J Biomater Appl; 2007 Nov; 22(3):223-39. PubMed ID: 17255157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional printing of bone repair and replacement materials: impact on craniofacial surgery.
Ricci JL; Clark EA; Murriky A; Smay JE
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):304-8. PubMed ID: 22337431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Autogenous bone graft: basic science and clinical implications.
Rogers GF; Greene AK
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):323-7. PubMed ID: 22337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic evaluation of regenerated bone following poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid/hydroxyapatite and deproteinized bovine bone graft in sinus lifting.
Y Baena RR; Lupi SM; Pastorino R; Maiorana C; Lucchese A; Rizzo S
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):845-8. PubMed ID: 23714894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preclinical animal model for de novo bone formation in human maxillary sinus.
Schlegel KA; Rupprecht S; Petrovic L; Honert C; Srour S; von Wilmowsky C; Felszegy E; Nkenke E; Lutz R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e37-44. PubMed ID: 19716490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of calvarial bone defects in rats using microcomputed tomography: potential for a novel composite material and a new quantitative measurement.
Efeoglu C; Burke JL; Parsons AJ; Aitchison GA; Scotchford C; Rudd C; Vikram A; Fisher SE
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 47(8):616-21. PubMed ID: 19395133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
