1743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19461821)
1. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based interventional pain management: principles, problems, potential and applications.
Manchikanti L; Boswell MV; Giordano J
Pain Physician; 2007 Mar; 10(2):329-56. PubMed ID: 17387356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):73-108. PubMed ID: 19165298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
Manchikanti L; Boswell MV; Singh V; Benyamin RM; Fellows B; Abdi S; Buenaventura RM; Conn A; Datta S; Derby R; Falco FJ; Erhart S; Diwan S; Hayek SM; Helm S; Parr AT; Schultz DM; Smith HS; Wolfer LR; Hirsch JA;
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):699-802. PubMed ID: 19644537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
Bailey B; Amre DK
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods for evidence synthesis in interventional pain management.
Manchikanti L; Heavner JE; Racz GB; Mekhail N; Schultz DM; Hansen HC; Singh V
Pain Physician; 2003 Jan; 6(1):89-111. PubMed ID: 16878165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management and potential implications.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Derby R; Helm S; Trescot AM; Staats PS; Prager JP; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(3):271-89. PubMed ID: 18523500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reassessment of evidence synthesis of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management.
Manchikanti L; Singh V; Derby R; Schultz DM; Benyamin RM; Prager JP; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(4):393-482. PubMed ID: 18690276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithmic approach for clinical management of chronic spinal pain.
Manchikanti L; Helm S; Singh V; Benyamin RM; Datta S; Hayek SM; Fellows B; Boswell MV;
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E225-64. PubMed ID: 19668283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
Gilchrist JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
