These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19462363)

  • 21. Analysis of long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty retrievals.
    Maloney WJ; Schmalzried T; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Dec; (405):70-8. PubMed ID: 12461358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface pretreatment for prolonged survival of cemented tibial prosthesis components: full- vs. surface-cementation technique.
    Marx R; Qunaibi M; Wirtz DC; Niethard FU; Mumme T
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():61. PubMed ID: 16262888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cement technique changes improved hip resurfacing longevity - implant retrieval findings.
    Campbell P; Takamura K; Lundergan W; Esposito C; Amstutz HC
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19583544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of time in-situ and implant type on fixation strength of cemented tibial trays - a post mortem retrieval analysis.
    Gebert de Uhlenbrock A; Püschel V; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Bishop NE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):929-35. PubMed ID: 22819669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component.
    Estok DM; Orr TE; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 9021500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components.
    Bitsch RG; Jäger S; Lürssen M; Loidolt T; Schmalzried TP; Clarius M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Aug; 28(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 20162694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of circular statistics in the study of crack distribution around cemented femoral components.
    Mann KA; Gupta S; Race A; Miller MA; Cleary RJ
    J Biomech; 2003 Aug; 36(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 12831752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The cement mantle of femoral hip implants is more influenced by stem-broach sizing than by shape: an in vitro CT analysis of straight Charnley-Kerboul and anatomic Lubinus SPII stems.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1473-81. PubMed ID: 19198861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does the line-to-line cementing technique of the femoral stem create an adequate cement mantle?
    Sevaldsen K; S Husby O; B Lian Ø; S Husby V
    Hip Int; 2021 Sep; 31(5):618-623. PubMed ID: 32551930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A ported, proximally-cemented femoral stem for total hip arthroplasty. Development and clinical application.
    Edidin AA; Merritt PO; Hack BH; Manley MT
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Sep; 80(5):869-75. PubMed ID: 9768901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standard and line-to-line cementation of a polished short hip stem: Long-term in vitro implant stability.
    Morellato K; Grupp TM; Bader U; Sungu M; Fink B; Cristofolini L
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Oct; 36(10):2736-2744. PubMed ID: 29727032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monitoring the integrity of the cement-metal interface of total joint components in vitro using acoustic emission and ultrasound.
    Davies JP; Tse MK; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 8872581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Loss of cement-bone interlock in retrieved tibial components from total knee arthroplasties.
    Miller MA; Goodheart JR; Izant TH; Rimnac CM; Cleary RJ; Mann KA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):304-13. PubMed ID: 23975251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cement microcracks in thin-mantle regions after in vitro fatigue loading.
    Mann KA; Gupta S; Race A; Miller MA; Cleary RJ; Ayers DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 15284982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can plate osteosynthesis of periprosthethic femoral fractures cause cement mantle failure around a stable hip stem? A biomechanical analysis.
    Giesinger K; Ebneter L; Day RE; Stoffel KK; Yates PJ; Kuster MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1308-12. PubMed ID: 24439999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding.
    Verdonschot N; Tanck E; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Dec; 42(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 9827679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
    Murray DW
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e462-3. PubMed ID: 21902131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.