These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19462559)
21. [Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability]. Schlote A; Richter M; Wunderlich MT; Poppendick U; Möller C; Wallesch CW Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Feb; 47(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 18247269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inter and intra-observer reliability in Kurtzke scoring systems in multiple sclerosis. Amato MP; Groppi C; Siracusa GF; Fratiglioni L Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():129-31. PubMed ID: 3654175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale. Fortin AJ; Cheang M; Latosinsky S Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Nov; 100(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 16819568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A multicentre study on the reliability of qualitative and quantitative nail-fold videocapillaroscopy assessment. Hofstee HM; Serné EH; Roberts C; Hesselstrand R; Scheja A; Moore TL; Wildt M; Manning JB; Vonk Noordegraaf A; Voskuyl AE; Herrick AL Rheumatology (Oxford); 2012 Apr; 51(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 22190689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. White matter hyperintensities and rating scales-observer reliability varies with lesion load. Wardlaw JM; Ferguson KJ; Graham C J Neurol; 2004 May; 251(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 15164192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society. Slieker-ten Hove MC; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Eijkemans MJ; Steegers-Theunissen RP; Burger CW; Vierhout ME Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 19090583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultraviolet B sensitivity of peripheral lymphocytes as an independent risk factor for cutaneous melanoma. Pedeux R; Sales F; Pourchet J; Kallassy M; Fayolle C; Boniol M; Severi G; Ghanem G; Nakazawa HN; Autier P; Doré JF Eur J Cancer; 2006 Jan; 42(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 16337788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro sensitivity to ultraviolet B light and skin cancer risk: a case-control analysis. Wang LE; Xiong P; Strom SS; Goldberg LH; Lee JE; Ross MI; Mansfield PF; Gershenwald JE; Prieto VG; Cormier JN; Duvic M; Clayman GL; Weber RS; Lippman SM; Amos CI; Spitz MR; Wei Q J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Dec; 97(24):1822-31. PubMed ID: 16368944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter-observer agreement of tests used for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation. Rosenstock C; Gillesberg I; Gätke MR; Levin D; Kristensen MS; Rasmussen LS Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Sep; 49(8):1057-62. PubMed ID: 16095443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intra- and inter-observer agreement when using a descriptive classification scale for clinical assessment of faecal consistency in growing pigs. Pedersen KS; Toft N Prev Vet Med; 2011 Mar; 98(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 21185096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliability of a test measuring transversus abdominis muscle recruitment with a pressure biofeedback unit. von Garnier K; Köveker K; Rackwitz B; Kober U; Wilke S; Ewert T; Stucki G Physiotherapy; 2009 Mar; 95(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 19627680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of a sleep questionnaire in Indian population. Bhatia M; Prasad K; Pandey RM J Assoc Physicians India; 2004 Jun; 52():464-6. PubMed ID: 15645956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the physical examination methods used to assess patients with patellofemoral joint instability. Smith TO; Clark A; Neda S; Arendt EA; Post WR; Grelsamer RP; Dejour D; Almqvist KF; Donell ST Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21715175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visual analogue scale for assessing breast nodularity in non-discrete lumpy breasts: the Lucknow-Cardiff breast nodularity scale. Kumar S; Rai R; Das V; Kumar S; Dwivedi V; Agrawal GG Breast; 2010 Jun; 19(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 20223665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new device for objective assessment of skin type in Caucasians by violet light reflectance. Rubegni P; Cevenini G; Stanghellini E; Andreassi M; Sbano P; Fabiani P; Andreassi L Int J Cosmet Sci; 2002 Aug; 24(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 18498510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The reliability of transcranial duplex scanning in parkinsonian patients: comparison of different observers and ultrasound systems. Vlaar A; Tromp SC; Weber WE; Hustinx RM; Mess WH Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S83-8. PubMed ID: 20094977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phototype reproducibility and relation to objectively measured skin sensitivity is best when burn and tan reactivity to sun are answered separately. Bieliauskiene G; Philipsen PA; Wulf HC Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2018 Nov; 34(6):366-373. PubMed ID: 29882998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Self-reported pigmentary phenotypes and race are significant but incomplete predictors of Fitzpatrick skin phototype in an ethnically diverse population. He SY; McCulloch CE; Boscardin WJ; Chren MM; Linos E; Arron ST J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Oct; 71(4):731-7. PubMed ID: 24928709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of subjective grading and objective assessment in meibography. Pult H; Riede-Pult B Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Feb; 36(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23108007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry. Kouchi M; Mochimaru M Appl Ergon; 2011 Mar; 42(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 20947062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]