These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19463665)

  • 1. Yield strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts with coronal retention.
    Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U; Pfeiffer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):382-7. PubMed ID: 19463665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Yield strength of zirconia and glass fibre-reinforced posts.
    Pfeiffer P; Schulz A; Nergiz I; Schmage P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16409520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface conditioning on the retentive bond strengths of fiberreinforced composite posts.
    Schmage P; Cakir FY; Nergiz I; Pfeiffer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):368-77. PubMed ID: 19961995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bending resistance of prefabricated titanium posts following molten cast core attachment.
    Pfeiffer P; Nergiz I; Schmage P; Platzer U
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 15279479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
    D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
    Naumann M; Preuss A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored by different FRC posts: an in vitro study.
    Torabi K; Fattahi F
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 19884709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems.
    Al-Omiri MK; Al-Wahadni AM
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):890-9. PubMed ID: 17014528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review.
    Bitter K; Kielbassa AM
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 18269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.
    Yenisey M; Kulunk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 18182184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin.
    Bell AM; Lassila LV; Kangasniemi I; Vallittu PK
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):533-9. PubMed ID: 16005792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bending resistance of unit cast posts-and-cores compared with noble posts following molten cast core attachment.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Schulz A; Nergiz I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 16457672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture strength of endodontically-treated teeth restored with post and cores and composite cores only.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 19678448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The flexural properties of endodontic post materials.
    Stewardson DA; Shortall AC; Marquis PM; Lumley PJ
    Dent Mater; 2010 Aug; 26(8):730-6. PubMed ID: 20413150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts and full-ceramic crown coverage.
    Signore A; Benedicenti S; Kaitsas V; Barone M; Angiero F; Ravera G
    J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19091452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths.
    Giovani AR; Vansan LP; de Sousa Neto MD; Paulino SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 19231570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.