BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19464312)

  • 1. The role of view in human face detection.
    Burton AM; Bindemann M
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):2026-36. PubMed ID: 19464312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size-invariant but viewpoint-dependent representation of faces.
    Lee Y; Matsumiya K; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1901-10. PubMed ID: 16469348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view.
    Newell FN; Chiroro P; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):509-34. PubMed ID: 10428688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the loss of diagnosticity of the eye region of the face a common aspect of acquired prosopagnosia?
    Rossion B; Kaiser MD; Bub D; Tanaka JW
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):69-78. PubMed ID: 19338717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: evidence from eye-tracking data.
    Saether L; Van Belle W; Laeng B; Brennen T; Øvervoll M
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2870-80. PubMed ID: 19733582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces.
    Burke D; Taubert J; Higman T
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2164-9. PubMed ID: 17572467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A combinatorial study of pose effects in unfamiliar face recognition.
    Van der Linde I; Watson T
    Vision Res; 2010 Mar; 50(5):522-33. PubMed ID: 20043938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face, body, and center of gravity mediate person detection in natural scenes.
    Bindemann M; Scheepers C; Ferguson HJ; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 20695695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human and chimpanzee face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): role of exposure and impact on categorical perception.
    Martin-Malivel J; Okada K
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 121(6):1145-55. PubMed ID: 18085867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Shastri KK; Abdi H; Neville-Smith M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1207-30. PubMed ID: 19686016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
    Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays.
    Martini P; McKone E; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2102-9. PubMed ID: 16384592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze behavior in face comparison: the roles of sex, task, and symmetry.
    Armann R; Bülthoff I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1107-26. PubMed ID: 19525541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On second glance: still no high-level pop-out effect for faces.
    VanRullen R
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):3017-27. PubMed ID: 16125749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-orientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: a study using contrast-based recognition thresholds.
    Guo XM; Oruç I; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2254-60. PubMed ID: 19540870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfer between pose and expression training in face recognition.
    Chen W; Liu CH
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 19056417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.