These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19464352)

  • 1. Numerical calibration of the Andersen cascade impactor using a single jet model.
    Gulak Y; Jayjock E; Muzzio F; Bauer A; McGlynn P
    Int J Pharm; 2009 Jul; 377(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 19464352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing bounce effects in the Andersen cascade impactor.
    Dunbar C; Kataya A; Tiangbe T
    Int J Pharm; 2005 Sep; 301(1-2):25-32. PubMed ID: 16023806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of inertial particle collectors in evaluating pharmaceutical aerosol delivery systems.
    Marple VA; Olson BA; Miller NC
    J Aerosol Med; 1998; 11 Suppl 1():S139-53. PubMed ID: 10180727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the TSI Model 3306 Impactor Inlet with the Andersen Cascade Impactor: solution metered dose inhalers.
    Myrdal PB; Stein SW; Mogalian E; Hoye W; Gupta A
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2004 Sep; 30(8):859-68. PubMed ID: 15521331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of sampling volume on dry powder inhaler (DPI)-emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSDs) measured by the Next-Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI) and the Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI).
    Mohammed H; Roberts DL; Copley M; Hammond M; Nichols SC; Mitchell JP
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2012 Sep; 13(3):875-82. PubMed ID: 22678745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aerodynamic characteristics of nebulized terbutaline sulphate using the Andersen Cascade Impactor compared to the Next Generation Impactor.
    Abdelrahim ME
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2011 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 20100034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New concept for the variable flow rate Andersen cascade impactor and calibration data.
    Nichols SC; Brown DR; Smurthwaite M
    J Aerosol Med; 1998; 11 Suppl 1():S133-8. PubMed ID: 10180726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mensuration and cleaning of the jets in Andersen cascade impactors.
    Svensson M; Pettersson G; Asking L
    Pharm Res; 2005 Jan; 22(1):161-5. PubMed ID: 15771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative precision of inhaler aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) metrics by full resolution and abbreviated andersen cascade impactors (ACIs): part 2--investigation of bias in extra-fine mass fraction with AIM-HRT impactor.
    Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Doyle CC; Ali RS; Avvakoumova VI; Christopher JD; Quiroz J; Strickland H; Tougas T; Lyapustina S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2010 Sep; 11(3):1115-8. PubMed ID: 20623212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
    Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Cho SH; Kim KY; Lee T; Reponen T
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aerodynamic sizing of metered dose inhalers: an evaluation of the Andersen and Next Generation pharmaceutical impactors and their USP methods.
    Kamiya A; Sakagami M; Hindle M; Byron PR
    J Pharm Sci; 2004 Jul; 93(7):1828-37. PubMed ID: 15176070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part II: Archival calibration.
    Marple VA; Olson BA; Santhanakrishnan K; Mitchell JP; Murray SC; Hudson-Curtis BL
    J Aerosol Med; 2003; 16(3):301-24. PubMed ID: 14572327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of the Andersen cascade impactor for the characterization of nasal products.
    Garmise RJ; Hickey AJ
    J Pharm Sci; 2008 Aug; 97(8):3462-6. PubMed ID: 18081008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The comparison of fluid dynamics parameters in an Andersen cascade impactor equipped with and without a preseparator.
    Dechraksa J; Suwandecha T; Maliwan K; Srichana T
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2014 Jun; 15(3):792-801. PubMed ID: 24760469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective analysis of acute inhalation toxicity studies: comparison of actual concentrations by filter and cascade impactor analyses.
    Pauluhn J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 15927328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and process aspects of laboratory scale SCF particle formation systems.
    Vemavarapu C; Mollan MJ; Lodaya M; Needham TE
    Int J Pharm; 2005 Mar; 292(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 15725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cascade impactor practice for a high dose dry powder inhaler at 90 L/min: NGI versus modified 6-stage and 8-stage ACI.
    Kamiya A; Sakagami M; Byron PR
    J Pharm Sci; 2009 Mar; 98(3):1028-39. PubMed ID: 18661538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance estimation of a Venturi scrubber using a computational model for capturing dust particles with liquid spray.
    Pak SI; Chang KS
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Dec; 138(3):560-73. PubMed ID: 16860933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of PharmASep unit for processing microspheres.
    Jo YW; Woo BH; Hazrati AM; DeLuca PP
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2001 Mar; 2(1):E-TN2. PubMed ID: 14727886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and calibration of a low flow parallel stage impactor.
    Tuchman DP; Esmen NA; Weyel DA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Jan; 47(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3946200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.