These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19464491)

  • 1. Reference values: no need for confusion.
    Obuchowski NA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 137(6):1572-3. PubMed ID: 19464491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Zhou XH; Qin G
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 15635678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case-control studies.
    Mercaldo ND; Lau KF; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2170-83. PubMed ID: 16927452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referent values and equipoise: editors' notes.
    Rice TW; Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 137(1):256-7. PubMed ID: 19154942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The quality of measurement methods and its statistical estimation].
    Läärä E; Aro S
    Duodecim; 1988; 104(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 3409823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding statistical terms: 4 - Diagnostic tests.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Jun; 47(6):71-2. PubMed ID: 19494344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to analyze reports on new clinical tests.
    Davidson RA
    Contemp Urol; 1995 Jul; 7(7):41-7. PubMed ID: 10150578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New confidence intervals for the difference between two sensitivities at a fixed level of specificity.
    Qin G; Hsu YS; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3487-502. PubMed ID: 16345124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matched-sample analysis: sensitivity, specificity, and P values.
    Tamhane A
    Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Feb; 46(3):474-5; author reply 475. PubMed ID: 18181745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
    Gilchrist JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A GEE approach to estimating accuracy and its confidence intervals for correlated data.
    Lim Y
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 31448536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic versus predictive flow cytometry.
    Valet G
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):166-8. PubMed ID: 15529434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for within-patient correlation in assessing relative sensitivity of an adjunctive diagnostic test: application to lung cancer.
    Scharfstein DO; Ryea JL; Caffo B
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2110-26. PubMed ID: 17943997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rational evaluation of laboratory data. Problems and limits].
    Hänseler E; Keller H
    Internist (Berl); 1994 Jul; 35(7):609-18. PubMed ID: 7928162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Remediastinoscopy: a statistical reinterpretation.
    Lim E; Dusmet M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 137(1):254-5; author reply 255-6. PubMed ID: 19154940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.