306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19464523)
1. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
Xu Y; Collins LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models.
Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():126-35. PubMed ID: 26074305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generalized alternating stimulation: a novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 17624444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-latency evoked acoustic potentials in patients with cochlear implants compared with normally hearing subjects].
Danilkina GV; Wolberet T; Vishniakov VV; Hoppe U
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2009; (3):16-8. PubMed ID: 19692958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term sensorineural hearing loss induces functional changes in the rat auditory nerve.
Shepherd RK; Roberts LA; Paolini AG
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 20(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 15579167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; van Zanten GA
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. model development at low pulse rates: general model and application to individuals.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):15-30. PubMed ID: 19110049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants.
Polak M; Hodges AV; King JE; Balkany TJ
Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):104-16. PubMed ID: 14759574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
