These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19464837)

  • 1. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19464837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between quantification methods of carotid artery stenosis and computed tomographic angiography.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 20498548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carotid stenosis evaluation by 64-slice CTA: comparison of NASCET, ECST and CC grading methods.
    Kılıçkap G; Ergun E; Başbay E; Koşar P; Kosar U
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 21858656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carotid artery stenosis quantification: concordance analysis between radiologist and semi-automatic computer software by using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography.
    Saba L; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Calleo G; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 20031358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability in measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis by arch angiography and duplex ultrasonography--time for a reappraisal?
    Griffiths GD; Razzaq R; Farrell A; Ashleigh R; Charlesworth D
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 21(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11237785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Measurements by DSA: Comparison of the NASCET and WASID Methods.
    Chen L; Zhan Q; Ma C; Liu Q; Zhang X; Tian X; Jiang Y; Dong Y; Chen S; Lu J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130991. PubMed ID: 26115309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between MIP and MPR techniques in the carotid artery stenosis degree measurement. Evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiograph.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18432165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: agreement of ECST, NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement.
    Wardlaw JM; Lewis S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15964165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between US-PSV and MDCTA in the quantification of carotid artery stenosis.
    Saba L; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 19246169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery.
    Müller M; Bartylla K; Rolshausen A; Piepgras U; Schimrigk K
    Vasa; 1998 Feb; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9540429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: can CTA overcome the confusion?
    Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Minar E; Lammer J
    J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Aug; 13(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16928157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carotid Stenosis Index. A new method of measuring internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Bladin CF; Alexandrov AV; Murphy J; Maggisano R; Norris JW
    Stroke; 1995 Feb; 26(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 7831693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Angiographic quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery].
    Bartylla K; Huber G
    Radiologe; 1995 Nov; 35(11):801-7. PubMed ID: 8657881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of color-flow Doppler scanning, power Doppler scanning, and frequency shift for assessment of carotid artery stenosis.
    Müller M; Ciccotti P; Reiche W; Hagen T
    J Vasc Surg; 2001 Dec; 34(6):1090-5. PubMed ID: 11743566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MDCTA of carotid plaque degree of stenosis: evaluation of interobserver agreement.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):W41-6. PubMed ID: 18094271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grading of proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by Doppler/duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA): correlation and interrater reliability in real-life practice.
    Matz O; Nikoubashman O; Rajkumar P; Keuler A; Wiesmann M; Schulz JB; Reich A
    Acta Neurol Belg; 2017 Mar; 117(1):183-188. PubMed ID: 27464734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater agreement for high grade carotid artery stenosis measurement and treatment decision.
    Stapf C; Hofmeister C; Hartmann A; Seyfert S; Koch HC; Mohr JP; Marx P; Mast H
    Eur J Med Res; 2000 Jan; 5(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 10657286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.
    U-King-Im JM; Trivedi RA; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Hollingworth W; Graves M; Joubert I; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Stroke; 2004 Sep; 35(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 15243149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement.
    van Prehn J; Muhs BE; Pramanik B; Ollenschleger M; Rockman CB; Cayne NS; Adelman MA; Jacobowitz GR; Maldonado TS
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 36(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18585935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal.
    Alexandrov AV; Bladin CF; Maggisano R; Norris JW
    Stroke; 1993 Sep; 24(9):1292-6. PubMed ID: 8362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.