841 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19465738)
1. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.
Tecco S; D'Attilio M; Tetè S; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.
Turnbull NR; Birnie DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 17346597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Fleming PS; Dibiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 19123718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems.
Pringle AM; Petrie A; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 19651344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design.
Henao SP; Kusy RP
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15747819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections.
Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):738-42. PubMed ID: 18456148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
Henao SP; Kusy RP
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
