135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1946601)
1. Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography.
Desponds L; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Hessler C; Samiri A; Valley JF
Phys Med Biol; 1991 Sep; 36(9):1165-82. PubMed ID: 1946601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.
Toroi P; Zanca F; Young KC; van Ongeval C; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2368-75. PubMed ID: 17268798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
Boone JM
Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
Küchler M; Friedrich M
Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.
Jennings RJ; Eastgate RJ; Siedband MP; Ergun DL
Med Phys; 1981; 8(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 7290015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of radiation dose and image quality in mammography: a clinical evaluation of rhodium versus molybdenum.
Monticciolo DL; Sprawls P; Kruse BD; Peterson JE
South Med J; 1996 Apr; 89(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 8614878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; di Maggio C
Eur Radiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):2559-66. PubMed ID: 16733678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines.
Underwood AC; Law J; Goodman DA; Robinson A; Rust A
Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
