These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1946601)

  • 21. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.
    Bernhardt P; Mertelmeier T; Hoheisel M
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
    Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images.
    Chakraborty DP
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10036663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Catalog of x-ray spectra of Mo-, Rh-, and W-anode-based x-ray tubes from 10 to 50 kV.
    Ketelhut S; Büermann L; Hilgers G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33902019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Jesneck JL; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):588-99. PubMed ID: 15789606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range.
    Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
    Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
    Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography.
    Cardenosa G; Eklund GW
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):894-5. PubMed ID: 1535914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
    Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
    Burns CB; Renner JB
    Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.