125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19466239)
1. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis--a systematic review.
Fedorowicz Z; Sequeira P
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):ii. PubMed ID: 19466239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to letter to the editor: Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis.
Estrela C; Silva JA; Alencar AH; Leles CR; Decurcio DA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(5):ii. PubMed ID: 19936507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Antibacterial Effect of Azadirachta indica (Neem) or Curcuma longa (Turmeric) against Enterococcus faecalis Compared with That of 5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine in vitro.
Joy Sinha D; D S Nandha K; Jaiswal N; Vasudeva A; Prabha Tyagi S; Pratap Singh U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2017; 58(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 28724858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EFFECTS OF ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS ON THE PLANKTONIC FORM OF ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: A REVIEW.
Mohammadi Z
Niger J Med; 2015; 24(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 27487599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine irrigants on the antibacterial activities of alkaline media against Enterococcus faecalis.
Ma J; Tong Z; Ling J; Liu H; Wei X
Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 25956995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.
Oliveira DP; Barbizam JV; Trope M; Teixeira FB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):702-6. PubMed ID: 17368057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan and other endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.
Shenoi PR; Morey ES; Makade CS; Gunwal MK; Khode RT; Wanmali SS
Gen Dent; 2016; 64(5):60-3. PubMed ID: 27599284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial effcacy of three root canal irrigants-BioPure MTAD, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as a final rinse against E. faecalis.
Agrawal V; Rao MR; Dhingra K; Gopal VR; Mohapatra A; Mohapatra A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):842-7. PubMed ID: 24685785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.
Arslan S; Ozbilge H; Kaya EG; Er O
Saudi Med J; 2011 May; 32(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 21556468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigation agents].
Dmitrieva NA; Krechina EK; Iarygina LB; Efremov NV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2013; 92(5):9-11. PubMed ID: 24300699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium hypochlorite and octenidine hydrochloride in vitro.
Tirali RE; Bodur H; Sipahi B; Sungurtekin E
Aust Endod J; 2013 Apr; 39(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 23551508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antimicrobial activity of Chlorhexidine, Peracetic acid and Sodium hypochlorite/etidronate irrigant solutions against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.
Arias-Moliz MT; Ordinola-Zapata R; Baca P; Ruiz-Linares M; García García E; Hungaro Duarte MA; Monteiro Bramante C; Ferrer-Luque CM
Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1188-93. PubMed ID: 25515403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of four endodontic irrigants using an in vitro model infected by Enterococcus faecalis].
Wang DM; Gao XJ; Shen S
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 42(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 17683670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combinations within dentinal tubules.
Heling I; Chandler NP
Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 9823123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antimicrobial efficacy of ozonated water, gaseous ozone, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in infected human root canals.
Estrela C; Estrela CR; Decurcio DA; Hollanda AC; Silva JA
Int Endod J; 2007 Feb; 40(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 17229112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Susceptibilties of two Enterococcus faecalis phenotypes to root canal medications.
Abdullah M; Ng YL; Gulabivala K; Moles DR; Spratt DA
J Endod; 2005 Jan; 31(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 15614002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The susceptibility of starved, stationary phase, and growing cells of Enterococcus faecalis to endodontic medicaments.
Portenier I; Waltimo T; Ørstavik D; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2005 May; 31(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 15851934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of the antimicrobial effect of three irrigant solutions (chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidinated MUMS).
Bidar M; Hooshiar S; Naderinasab M; Moazzami M; Orafaee H; Naghavi N; Jafarzadeh H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):436-9. PubMed ID: 23151688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chemomechanical strategies to manage endodontic infections.
Mohammadi Z
Dent Today; 2010 Feb; 29(2):91-2, 94, 96 passim; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 20196338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite.
Vianna ME; Gomes BP; Berber VB; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; de Souza-Filho FJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jan; 97(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 14716261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
