These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19466253)

  • 1. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.
    Ulusoy C
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19466253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
    Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets.
    Eminkahyagil N; Arman A; Cetinşahin A; Karabulut E
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 16539561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding.
    Radlanski RJ
    J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Jul; 62(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 11508106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T; Gioka C; Eliades G; Makou M
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal-an in vitro study.
    Shah P; Sharma P; Goje SK; Kanzariya N; Parikh M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 May; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 31056715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
    Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enamel surface roughness following debonding resin clean up using high speed air-turbine and electric handpieces. In vitro study.
    Yousry TN; Abolgheit S; Kassem HE
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):609. PubMed ID: 38796434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Campbell PM
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7785800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.