These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19466736)

  • 1. Improving surgical outcomes for patients with cancer: an Australian perspective.
    Crowe P
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):478-80. PubMed ID: 19466736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.
    Watters DA; Green AJ; van Rij A
    ANZ J Surg; 2006; 76(1-2):78-83. PubMed ID: 16483303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National Breast Cancer Audit: establishing a web-based data system.
    Boult M; Cuncins-Hearn A; Tyson S; Kollias J; Babidge W; Maddern G
    ANZ J Surg; 2005 Oct; 75(10):844-7. PubMed ID: 16176221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National breast cancer audit: overview of invasive breast cancer management.
    Cuncins-Hearn AV; Boult M; Babidge W; Zorbas H; Villanueva E; Evans A; Oliver D; Kollias J; Reeve T; Maddern G
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Aug; 76(8):745-50. PubMed ID: 16916399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providers and consumers support the Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality.
    Semmens JB; Mountain JA; Sanfilippo FM; Barraclough JY; McKenzie A; Mukhtar SA; Haynes NS; Aitken RJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 16768765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in surgical treatment of younger patients with breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand.
    Wang J; Boult M; Tyson S; Babidge W; Zorbas H; Kollias J; Roder D; Maddern G
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Aug; 78(8):665-9. PubMed ID: 18796024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing the quality of care for patients with breast cancer: seven years of experience with a Dutch auditing system.
    Veerbeek L; van der Geest L; Wouters M; Guicherit O; Does-den Heijer A; Nortier J; Marinelli A; Tollenaar R; Struikmans H
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):714-8. PubMed ID: 21458947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of the Australasian vascular surgical audit.
    Bourke BM; Beiles CB; Thomson IA; Grigg MJ; Fitridge R
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 55(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 21906906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disparities in access to breast care nurses for breast surgeons: a National Breast Cancer Audit survey.
    Marsh C; Wang J; Kollias J; Boult M; Rice J; Maddern G
    Breast; 2010 Apr; 19(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20172728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring and reporting on quality in health care: a framework and road map for improving care.
    Brien SE; Dixon E; Ghali WA
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):462-6. PubMed ID: 19466720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: how surgical audits can be used to promote the update of surgical evidence.
    Wang J; Boult M; Roder D; Babidge W; Kollias J; Maddern G
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Jun; 78(6):437-8. PubMed ID: 18522561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Principles and guidelines for surgeons--management of symptomatic breast cancer. On behalf of the European Society of Surgical Oncology.
    Blichert-Toft M; Smola MG; Cataliotti L; O'Higgins N
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1998; 87(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 9598248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
    Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ADIPS pilot National Diabetes in Pregnancy Audit Project.
    Simmons D; Cheung NW; McIntyre HD; Flack JR; Lagstrom J; Bond D; Johnson E; Wolmarans L; Wein P; Sinha AK;
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 17550486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National benchmarking between the Nordic countries on the quality of care.
    Mainz J; Hjulsager M; Og MT; Burgaard J
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):505-7. PubMed ID: 19072992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
    Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical audits: why and for whom.
    Boult M; Maddern GJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):572-8. PubMed ID: 17610696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of guidelines in quality improvement for cancer surgery.
    Browman GP; Brouwers M
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):467-9. PubMed ID: 19466734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving quality of cancer care through surgical audit.
    van Gijn W; van de Velde CJ;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S23-6. PubMed ID: 20615648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ASERNIP-S: international trend setting.
    Maddern G; Boult M; Ahern E; Babidge W
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):853-8. PubMed ID: 18959636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.