BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19466754)

  • 1. Mandatory second opinion in cytopathology.
    Lueck N; Jensen C; Cohen MB; Weydert JA
    Cancer; 2009 Apr; 117(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 19466754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.
    Coblentz TR; Mills SE; Theodorescu D
    Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 11283928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
    Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
    Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
    Kronz JD; Westra WH; Epstein JI
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2426-35. PubMed ID: 10590387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outside case review of surgical pathology for referred patients: the impact on patient care.
    Swapp RE; Aubry MC; Salomão DR; Cheville JC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 22775269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lymphoma diagnosis at an academic centre: rate of revision and impact on patient care.
    Bowen JM; Perry AM; Laurini JA; Smith LM; Klinetobe K; Bast M; Vose JM; Aoun P; Fu K; Greiner TC; Chan WC; Armitage JO; Weisenburger DD
    Br J Haematol; 2014 Jul; 166(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 24697285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology.
    Zan E; Yousem DM; Carone M; Lewin JS
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 20308451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Discrepancies in Mandatory Slide Review of Extradepartmental Head and Neck Cases: Experience at a Large Academic Center.
    Mehrad M; Chernock RD; El-Mofty SK; Lewis JS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Dec; 139(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 26619026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outside slide review in gynecologic oncology: impact on patient care and treatment.
    Eskander RN; Baruah J; Nayak R; Brueseke T; Ji T; Wardeh R; Tewari KS
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 May; 32(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 23518913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Raab SS
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):849-63. PubMed ID: 15555746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved cytodiagnostics and quality of patient care through double reading of selected cases by an expert cytopathologist.
    Kuijpers CC; Visser M; Sie-Go DM; de Leeuw H; de Rooij MJ; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Jun; 466(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 25775953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of first-opinion and second-opinion histopathology from dogs and cats with cancer: 430 cases (2001-2008).
    Regan RC; Rassnick KM; Balkman CE; Bailey DB; McDonough SP
    Vet Comp Oncol; 2010 Mar; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20230576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
    Silverman JF
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality in cancer diagnosis.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2010; 60(3):139-65. PubMed ID: 20444999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of second opinion in surgical pathology referral material of lymphoma.
    Al-Maghrabi JA; Sayadi HH
    Saudi Med J; 2012 Apr; 33(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 22485235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic second opinion: what does it add? Patient satisfaction, but diagnosis is rarely altered].
    Westland GJ; Nanayakkara PW; Kramer MH; Smulders YM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A777. PubMed ID: 19857308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis.
    Hamady ZZ; Mather N; Lansdown MR; Davidson L; Maclennan KA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15642429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central pathology review in multicenter trials and studies: lessons from the nephroblastoma trials.
    Vujanić GM; Sandstedt B; Kelsey A; Sebire NJ
    Cancer; 2009 May; 115(9):1977-83. PubMed ID: 19241454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.
    Gaudi S; Zarandona JM; Raab SS; English JC; Jukic DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 22892284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.