These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19467051)

  • 1. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different ultrasonic vibration protocols and their effects on retention of post-and-core to root canal.
    Braga NM; Brito M; da Silva JM; Miranda LS; de Carvalho JR; Faria-e-Silva AL
    Gen Dent; 2013 Aug; 61(5):40-2. PubMed ID: 23928437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal.
    Bergeron BE; Murchison DF; Schindler WG; Walker WA
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11487157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound on the removal of intracanal posts.
    Braga NM; Resende LM; Vasconcellos WA; Paulino SM; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 19903640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or zinc phosphate cements.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Alfredo E; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2004 Mar; 30(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15055437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth.
    Johnson WT; Leary JM; Boyer DB
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):487-8. PubMed ID: 9198432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fit of tapered posts in root canals luted with zinc phosphate cement: a histological study.
    Schmage P; Ozcan M; McMullan-Vogel C; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 15922445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents.
    Gomes AP; Kubo CH; Santos RA; Santos DR; Padilha RQ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Mar; 34(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11307266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
    Chandler NP; Qualtrough AJ; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 12946072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal.
    Dixon EB; Kaczkowski PJ; Nicholls JI; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 11833682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of the effect of core diameter for removing radicular post with ultrasound.
    Alfredo E; Garrido AD; Souza-Filho CB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15189318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the retention of adhesively luted intra-radicular posts.
    Satterthwaite JD; Stokes AN
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Sep; 12(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 15521391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two methods of removing zinc oxide-eugenol provisional cement residue from the internal surface of cast restorations.
    Mosharraf R; Soleimani B; Sanaee-Nasab M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 19430623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
    Hedlund SO; Johansson NG; Sjögren G
    Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal.
    Braga NM; Silva JM; Carvalho-Júnior JR; Ferreira RC; Saquy PC; Brito-Júnior M
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 22460315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques.
    Fakiha Z; Al-Aujan A; Al-Shamrani S
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Mar; 10(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11406794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of cemented cast posts and cores.
    Al-Ali K; Talic Y; Abduljabbar T; Omar R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 12854794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the shape core on custom cast dowel and core removal by ultrasonic energy.
    Queiroz EC; Menezes MS; Biffi JC; Soares CJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 17518982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.