844 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19467053)
1. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of cross-sectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis.
Zhang EW; Cheung GS; Zheng YF
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1394-8. PubMed ID: 20647104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.
Kim HC; Lee MH; Yum J; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Kim BM
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1195-9. PubMed ID: 20630298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis.
Kim TO; Cheung GS; Lee JM; Kim BM; Hur B; Kim HC
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19125976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use.
Inan U; Gonulol N
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1396-9. PubMed ID: 19801238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative computational analysis of the mechanical behavior of two nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Necchi S; Petrini L; Taschieri S; Migliavacca F
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1380-4. PubMed ID: 20647101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics.
Baek SH; Lee CJ; Versluis A; Kim BM; Lee W; Kim HC
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1283-6. PubMed ID: 21846549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between experimental cyclic fatigue resistance and numerical stress analysis for nickel-titanium rotary files.
Lee MH; Versluis A; Kim BM; Lee CJ; Hur B; Kim HC
J Endod; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1152-7. PubMed ID: 21763912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections.
Xu X; Eng M; Zheng Y; Eng D
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):372-5. PubMed ID: 16554216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical behaviour of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study.
Necchi S; Taschieri S; Petrini L; Migliavacca F
Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):939-49. PubMed ID: 19133083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries.
Versluis A; Kim HC; Lee W; Kim BM; Lee CJ
J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1399-403. PubMed ID: 22980187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Kim HC; Cheung GS; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Kang SI
J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 18498904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Park SY; Cheung GS; Yum J; Hur B; Park JK; Kim HC
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1200-4. PubMed ID: 20630299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Gaviglio I; Ibba A
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation.
Kim HC; Sung SY; Ha JH; Solomonov M; Lee JM; Lee CJ; Kim BM
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 24238449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
