51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19467400)
1. Flat panel cone beam computed tomography of the sinuses.
Zoumalan RA; Lebowitz RA; Wang E; Yung K; Babb JS; Jacobs JB
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jun; 140(6):841-4. PubMed ID: 19467400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of image quality of two different three-dimensional cone-beam-scanners used for orthopedic surgery in the bony structures of the pelvis in comparison with standard CT scans].
Stuby F; Seethaler AC; Shiozawa T; Weise K; Mroue A; Badke A; Buchgeister M; Ochs BG
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Dec; 149(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 21590660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental flat panel conebeam CT in the evaluation of patients with inflammatory sinonasal disease: Diagnostic efficacy and radiation dose savings.
Leiva-Salinas C; Flors L; Gras P; Más-Estellés F; Lemercier P; Patrie JT; Wintermark M; Martí-Bonmatí L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014; 35(11):2052-7. PubMed ID: 24970545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality of two different mobile cone beam computed tomographs for maxillofacial surgery.
Seeberger R; Buchgeister M; Seethaler AC; Shiozawa T; Hoffmann J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):731-4. PubMed ID: 22361302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of simulated cone beam computed tomography to conventional helical computed tomography for imaging of rhinosinusitis.
Fakhran S; Alhilali L; Sreedher G; Dohatcu AC; Lee S; Ferguson B; Branstetter BF
Laryngoscope; 2014 Sep; 124(9):2002-6. PubMed ID: 24449524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How does nose blowing effect the computed tomography of paranasal sinuses in chronic sinusitis?
Savranlar A; Uzun L; Ugur MB; Mahmutyazicioglu K; Ozer T; Gundogdu S
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 15664280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Usefulness of simple paranasal sinus radiographs and axial computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic sinusitis].
González Morales JE; Leal de Hernández L; González Spencer D
Rev Alerg Mex; 1998; 45(3):17-21. PubMed ID: 9718975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual single-source computed tomography using dual-source acquisition: a new technique for the dose-neutral intraindividual comparison of different scan protocols.
Werncke T; Meyer BC; Wacker FK; von Falck C
Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):742-8. PubMed ID: 24918463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D cone beam (CBCT) in evaluation of frontal recess: findings in youth population.
Minni A; Messineo D; Attanasio G; Pianura E; D'Ambrosio F
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Jul; 16(7):912-8. PubMed ID: 22953640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
Borgen L; Kalra MK; Laerum F; Hachette IW; Fredriksson CH; Sandborg M; Smedby O
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of effect of reconstruction filters on cone-beam computed tomography image quality.
Srinivasan K; Mohammadi M; Shepherd J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 37(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 25086963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of flat-panel-detector-based CT and multidetector-row CT in automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules using an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
Marten K; Dullin C; Machann W; Schmid JS; DAS M; Hermann KP; Engelke C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):716-23. PubMed ID: 19332516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT chest and gantry rotation time: does the rotation time influence image quality?
Beeres M; Wichmann JL; Paul J; Mbalisike E; Elsabaie M; Vogl TJ; Nour-Eldin NE
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):950-4. PubMed ID: 25140057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image-guided radiotherapy using a mobile kilovoltage x-ray device.
Sorensen SP; Chow PE; Kriminski S; Medin PM; Solberg TD
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 16551528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of calibration and detector temperature on the reconstructed cone beam computed tomography image quality: a study for the workflow of the iCAT Classic equipment.
Plachtovics M; Goczan J; Nagy K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Apr; 119(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 25687195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
