These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19467806)

  • 1. [Comparing two Prepidil gel regimens for cervical ripening before induction of labor at term: a randomized trial].
    Fekih M; Ben Zina N; Jnifen A; Nouri S; Ben Regaya L; Memmi A; Bouguizene S; Chaieb A; Bibi M; Sboui H; Khairi H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Jun; 38(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 19467806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for preinduction cervical ripening at term. A randomized trial.
    Wieland D; Friedman F
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug; 44(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 10483544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
    Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
    Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
    Panel P; Bascou V; de Meeus JB; Magnin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cervical ripening at term. A randomized and prospective study: Misoprotol versus dinoprostone].
    Trabelsi H; Mathlouthi N; Zayen S; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Trabelsi K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):362-9. PubMed ID: 22585642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor.
    Atad J; Hallak M; Auslender R; Porat-Packer T; Zarfati D; Abramovici H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 8559528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol as a labor induction agent.
    Magtibay PM; Ramin KD; Harris DY; Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 9502664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel.
    Nager CW; Key TC; Moore TR
    J Perinatol; 1987; 7(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 3504454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in patients with an indication for delivery.
    Darroca RJ; Buttino L; Miller J; Khamis HJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 8559529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial of intracervical versus posterior fornix dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Perry MY; Leaphart WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 14704238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical ripening : comparison of three methods. Preliminary results of a randomized prospective study].
    Allouche C; Dommesent D; Barjot P; Levy G
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Oct; 88(10):492-7. PubMed ID: 8248693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.