171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19468432)
1. Minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: A comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty.
Singh P; Jain P; Dharaskar A; Mandhani A; Dubey D; Kapoor R; Kumar A; Srivastava A
Indian J Urol; 2009 Jan; 25(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 19468432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for poorly functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Singh P; Kapoor R; Suri A; Singh KJ; Mandhani A; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Kumar A
Indian J Urol; 2007 Jan; 23(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19675751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Rukin NJ; Ashdown DA; Patel P; Liu S
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Mar; 89(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 17346411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally-invasive correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: do retrograde endo-incision techniques still have a role in the era of laparoscopic pyeloplasty?
Elabd SA; Elbahnasy AM; Farahat YA; Soliman MG; Taha MR; Elgarabawy MA; Figenshau R
Ther Adv Urol; 2009 Dec; 1(5):227-34. PubMed ID: 21789069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of three surgical methods of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in therapeutic effect and complication].
Chen WN; Ye XJ; Liu SJ; Xiong LL; Huang XB; Xu T; Wang XF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):817-821. PubMed ID: 27752162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dismembered laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty versus nondismembered laparoscopic Y-V pyeloplasty in the treatment of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a prospective study.
Szydełko T; Kasprzak J; Lewandowski J; Apoznański W; Dembowski J
J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1165-70. PubMed ID: 22515336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy.
Hoenig DM; Shalhav AL; Elbahnasy AM; McDougall EM; Smith D; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 1998 Apr; 12(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 9607438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis.
Gettman M; Lotan Y; Roerhborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 12478142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome.
Chen RN; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
Urol Clin North Am; 1998 May; 25(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 9633588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endopyelotomy review.
Bernardo N; Smith AD
Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Biyani CS; Minhas S; el Cast J; Almond DJ; Cooksey G; Hetherington JW
Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):305-10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 12180233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
