171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19468432)
21. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?
Ozayar A; Friedlander JI; Shakir NA; Gahan JC; Cadeddu JA; Morgan MS
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1278-82. PubMed ID: 25444983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transumbilical multi-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus transumbilical single-site laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: A retrospectively comparative study.
Liu D; Zhou H; Ma L; Xie H; Tao T; Cao H; Zhou X; Luo X; Chen S
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Dec; 13(6):618.e1-618.e5. PubMed ID: 28630020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contemporary results of endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sim HG; Tan YH; Wong M
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2005 Mar; 34(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 15827665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the results of laser endopyelotomy with two different technique in ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sen H; Bayrak O; Erdem Yilmaz A; Turgut O; Ozturk M; Erturhan S; Seckiner I
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Jun; 17(3):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 33583746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.
Danuser H; Ackermann DK; Böhlen D; Studer UE
J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 9400436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.
Chiancone F; Fedelini M; Pucci L; Meccariello C; Fedelini P
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 28191792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Percutaneous Endopyelotomy over High Pressure Balloon for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Parente A; Angulo JM; Burgos L; Romero RM; Rivas S; Ortiz R
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 25623746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
Dobry E; Usai P; Studer UE; Danuser H
Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Micropercutaneous endopyelotomy for the treatment of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Fernández-Bautista B; Parente A; Ortiz R; Burgos L; Angulo JM
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Oct; 16(5):687.e1-687.e4. PubMed ID: 32839134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
Menon P; Rao KL; Sodhi KS; Bhattacharya A; Saxena AK; Mittal BR
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in five pediatric cases of pelvic kidneys.
Muller CO; Blanc T; Peycelon M; El Ghoneimi A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):353.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26233554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient.
Casale P; Grady RW; Joyner BD; Zeltser IS; Figueroa TE; Mitchell ME
J Endourol; 2004 Nov; 18(9):875-8. PubMed ID: 15659924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction.
Symons SJ; Palit V; Biyani CS; Cartledge JJ; Browning AJ; Joyce AD
Indian J Urol; 2009 Jan; 25(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 19468425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
Xu W; Li H; Ji Z; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Xiao H; Liu G
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Schenkman EM; Tarry WF
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.
Zhang Y; Ouyang W; Xu H; Luan Y; Yang J; Lu Y; Hu J; Liu Z; Yu X; Guan W; Hu Z; Ye Z; Wang S; Li H
Urol Int; 2019; 103(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 31537001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
