These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1946869)

  • 1. Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action.
    Yantis S; Meyer DE; Smith JE
    Psychol Bull; 1991 Sep; 110(2):350-74. PubMed ID: 1946869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing specific hypotheses by fitting underlying distributions to categorical data.
    Johnson WD; Elston RC; Wickremasinghe AR
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 8019584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes.
    Heck DW; Erdfelder E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1440-1465. PubMed ID: 27311696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalized Processing Tree Models: Jointly Modeling Discrete and Continuous Variables.
    Heck DW; Erdfelder E; Kieslich PJ
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):893-918. PubMed ID: 29797178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two new defective distributions based on the Marshall-Olkin extension.
    Rocha R; Nadarajah S; Tomazella V; Louzada F
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Apr; 22(2):216-40. PubMed ID: 25951911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the evidence for response time mixture distributions.
    Dixon P
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):706-24. PubMed ID: 22903629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hominoid phylogeny estimated by model selection using goodness of fit significance tests.
    Czelusniak J; Goodman M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1995 Sep; 4(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 8845964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Gaviria JL
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):791-810. PubMed ID: 25381198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew-normal and skew-t distributions.
    Frühwirth-Schnatter S; Pyne S
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):317-36. PubMed ID: 20110247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The stochastic distribution of available coefficient of friction on quarry tiles for human locomotion.
    Chang WR; Matz S; Chang CC
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3363-6. PubMed ID: 22317231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parametric models for estimating the number of classes.
    Bunge J; Barger K
    Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 19067331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias-corrected estimation of the Rudas-Clogg-Lindsay mixture index of fit.
    Reiczigel J; Ispány M; Tusnády G; Michaletzky G; Marozzi M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):459-471. PubMed ID: 28898399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic comparisons of mixtures of parametric families in stochastic epidemics.
    Ortega EM; Alonso J; Ortega I
    Math Biosci; 2013 May; 243(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 23357286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of multi-stage dose-response mixture models, with applications.
    Ortega EM; Alonso J
    Math Biosci; 2014 Jul; 253():30-9. PubMed ID: 24548666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigations of the problems of assessing aflatoxin levels in peanuts.
    Giesbrecht FG; Whitaker TB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):739-53. PubMed ID: 9629654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple testing with heterogeneous multinomial distributions.
    Habiger J; Watts D; Anderson M
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):562-570. PubMed ID: 27599149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The spikes trains probability distributions: a stochastic calculus approach.
    Touboul J; Faugeras O
    J Physiol Paris; 2007; 101(1-3):78-98. PubMed ID: 18054210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.
    Jones M; Dzhafarov EN
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 24079307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian analysis of mixtures applied to post-synaptic potential fluctuations.
    Turner DA; West M
    J Neurosci Methods; 1993 Apr; 47(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 8321009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.