These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19468868)

  • 1. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches.
    Cole CD; McCall TD; Schmidt MH; Dailey AT
    Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med; 2009 Jun; 2(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 19468868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels.
    Ames CP; Acosta FL; Chi J; Iyengar J; Muiru W; Acaroglu E; Puttlitz CM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):E562-6. PubMed ID: 16205329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.
    Mobbs RJ; Phan K; Malham G; Seex K; Rao PJ
    J Spine Surg; 2015 Dec; 1(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 27683674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
    Gum JL; Reddy D; Glassman S
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2016 Jun; 6(2):e22. PubMed ID: 30237931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.
    Robertson PA; Armstrong WA; Woods DL; Rawlinson JJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1350-E1357. PubMed ID: 30383726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lan T; Hu SY; Zhang YT; Zheng YC; Zhang R; Shen Z; Yang XJ
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():86-93. PubMed ID: 29367001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):591-595. PubMed ID: 27231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Kunder SL; van Kuijk SMJ; Rijkers K; Caelers IJMH; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 28647584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. PubMed ID: 27843688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
    Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.
    Xu H; Tang H; Guan X; Jiang F; Xu N; Ju W; Zhu X; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Li M
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Mar; 72(1 Suppl Operative):21-6. PubMed ID: 23037820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].
    Fleege C; Rickert M; Rauschmann M
    Orthopade; 2015 Feb; 44(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 25588711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.